Prepared for the Public Health Agency of Canada
Supplier name: Advanis Inc.
Contract number: 6D142-22-6343
Contract value: $195,196.20 (including HST)
Award date: March 10, 2023
Delivery date: February 15th, 2024
Registration number: POR 145-22
For more information on this report, please contact Health Canada at:
por-rop@hc-sc.gc.ca
Ce rapport est aussi disponible en français.
The Childhood Immunization Coverage Survey in Key Populations (KPCICS): 2SLGBTQ+ and Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) Parents 2023
Report
Prepared for the Public Health Agency of Canada
Supplier Name: Advanis Inc.
February 2024
This report presents the methodological details for The Childhood Immunization Coverage Survey in Key Populations (KPCICS): 2SLGBTQ+ and Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) Parents 2023, conducted by Advanis Inc. on behalf of the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC). The survey was administered among 5,576 members of the adult Canadian general public, 584 of them where 2SLGBTQI+ or MSM, between August 3 and October 2, 2023.
Ce rapport est aussi disponible en français sous le titre: Enquête sur la couverture vaccinale des enfants dans les populations clés (ECVEPC) - Parents 2SLGBTQI+ et hommes ayant des relations sexuelles avec des hommes 2023
This publication may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes only. Prior written permission must be obtained from the Public Health Agency of Canada. For more information on this report, please contact:
por-rop@hc-sc.gc.ca
Health Canada, CPAB
200 Eglantine Driveway, Tunney's Pasture
Jeanne Mance Building, AL 1915C
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9
Catalogue Number:
H14-544/1-2024E-PDF
International Standard Book Number (ISBN):
978-0-660-69892-2
Related publications (registration number: 22-14):
Catalogue number: H14-544/1-2024F-PDF (Report, French)
International Standard Book Number (ISBN): 978-0-660-69893-9 (French)
©His Majesty the King in right of Canada, as represented by the Public Health Agency of Canada, 2024
Surveillance data suggests that vaccine coverage is uneven across Canada. Furthermore, results from existing surveillance tools suggest that certain key at-risk populations are under-surveyed.
New surveillance tools are needed to address data coverage gaps identified for at-risk populations and to inform public health vaccination programs and initiatives. In the effort of addressing vaccine coverage data gaps relating to at-risk populations, the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) sought third party support to develop a new surveillance initiative, the Childhood Immunization Coverage Survey in Key Populations (KPCICS) in Canada.
The core objective of this survey is to provide up-to-date childhood vaccine coverage data (e.g., on measles, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, COVID-19) specific to the 2SLGBTQI+ and MSM populations. The survey will assess parent/legal guardian/other person most knowledgeable's (PMK; e.g., child's step-parent, adoptive parent, foster parent, sister or brother, grandparent or relative caring for and responsible for health decisions for the child) opinions and views on their child's immunization uptake, as well as vaccine hesitancy and vaccine refusal. This survey will also investigate the reasons for vaccine hesitancy among these populations and the impact this has on routine childhood immunization, for each population.
The second objective is to consider the unknown effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on concurrent childhood immunizations to determine priorities for vaccine-preventable diseases, with the aim of identifying whether catch-up routine immunization campaigns are required.
The surveillance project aims to collect information on:
The COVID-19 pandemic has yielded a large shift in Canadians' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs towards vaccinations, including for these specific populations. For certain populations, recent evidence points that there has been a high prevalence of vaccine hesitancy and refusal for COVID-19 vaccines. Monitoring of parental attitudes is essential to predict expected vaccine uptake and to guide education and awareness efforts to promote vaccination among children issued from these specific populations.
New surveillance tools are needed to fill data coverage gaps identified for at-risk populations and to support the development of public health vaccination programs and initiatives tailored to these populations. With this in mind, the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) sought third party support to implement a new surveillance initiative titled: The Childhood Immunization Coverage Survey in Key Populations (KPCICS) in Canada.
Data collection was completed between August 3 to October 2, 2023. Respondents were offered an online survey through the use of Advanis' General Population Representative Sample (GPRS) and through Random digit dialing (RDD). Advanis sought a probability-based sample of 5,500 Canadian parents/guardians of children and adolescents younger than 18 years old living across Canada.
The target audience for this project were 2SLGBTQI+ and MSM populations in Canada who are parents/legal guardians/other persons most knowledgeable (PMK; e.g., child's step-parent, adoptive parent, foster parent, sister or brother, grandparent or relative caring for and responsible for health decisions for the child) for a child(ren) aged 17 years or younger living across Canada. The targeted number of completed surveys was 5,500 Canadian parents/legal guardians/PMK (including 500 from the targeted populations and 5,000 from the general population). Questions within the survey further filtered out responses from anyone under the age of 18 years (S1) and responses for anyone who is not the parent/legal guardian of a child(ren) under the age of 18 (S2). A total of 5,576 responses were obtained (588 from 2SLGBTQI+ (including 4 MSM not 2SLGBTQI+), 164 MSM and 4,988 from the general population) to reach quotas, where possible (Table 1). As part of the expected 5,000 a notable proportion ended up being part of the 2SLGBTQI+ community. Since this was the main target of this study, the results actually provided more of the target population and slightly less of the general public.
Advanis also worked to obtain nationally representative coverage of the following key sub-populations:
The 2SLGBTQI+ were defined as anyone who identified as not heterosexual and cis-gendered. The MSM were any men that indicated having sexual intercourse with another man, regardless of whether or not they considered themselves part of the 2SLGBTQI+ community. For more information about the target populations, please refer to section 4.
Data are unweighted since the population proportions were not available for this exact population of parents.
Most children with 2SLGBTQI+ or MSM parents have been vaccinated at least once (96% for those with 2SLGBTQI+ parents and 95% for those with MSM parents). A majority of those who received at least one vaccine also received all the recommended vaccines (71% for those with 2SLGBTQI+ parents and 71% for those with MSM parents).
Although most did not encounter obstacles when trying to get vaccinated, a child's fear of needles and the difficulty to book time off work or school for a vaccine appointment were the main obstacles mentioned by both 2SLGBTQI+ and MSM parents.
The main reasons for deciding not to get their child vaccinated or for being hesitant towards recommended childhood vaccination were concerns about the safety of the vaccine(s) or their side effects (61% for hesitant 2SLGBTQI+ parents and 62% for hesitant MSM parents).
Regarding the COVID-19 vaccine specifically, among 2SLGBTQI+ parents, almost three quarters (74%) said that their child has received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. It is also the case for 77% of MSM parents. The main reasons for hesitancy regarding the COVID-19 vaccine were concerns that not enough research has been done on the vaccine in children and concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and/or side effects.
The contract value for this study was $195,196.20 (including HST).
I hereby certify as a Senior Officer of Advanis that the deliverables fully comply with the Government of Canada's political neutrality requirements outlined in the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada and Procedures for Planning and Contracting Public Opinion Research.
Specifically, the deliverables do not contain any reference to electoral voting intentions, political party preferences, standings with the electorate, or ratings of the performance of a political party or its leader.
Nicolas Toutant
Vice President, Research and Evaluation
Advanis
nicolas.toutant@advanis.ca
Surveillance data suggests that vaccine coverage is uneven across Canada. Furthermore, results from existing surveillance tools suggest that certain key at-risk populations are under-surveyed. The childhood National Immunization Coverage survey (cNICS) is a general population survey that measures routine childhood immunization coverage among children aged 2, 7, 14 and 17 years and COVID-19 vaccine uptake in children ages 14 and 17 years, as well as parental knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about vaccination. This surveillance tool provides critical information about childhood immunization in Canada, though is limited in that it was not designed to sample from all child age ranges or from key at-risk populations.
Consequently, this results in insufficient data regarding routine childhood immunization status and COVID-19 vaccine coverage, and knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors towards vaccination within these specific groups. In turn, this hinders core immunization functions including COVID-19 vaccine and routine immunization surveillance, vaccine confidence, available data, policy, public health guidance, and knowledge mobilization activities.
In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has yielded a large shift in Canadians' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs towards vaccinations, including for these specific populations. For certain populations, recent evidence points that there has been a high prevalence of vaccine hesitancy and refusal for COVID-19 vaccines. Monitoring of parental attitudes is essential to predict expected vaccine uptake and to guide education and awareness efforts to promote vaccination among children issued from these specific populations.
New surveillance tools are needed to address data coverage gaps identified for at-risk populations and to inform public health vaccination programs and initiatives. In the effort of addressing vaccine coverage data gaps relating to at-risk populations, the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) is seeking third party support to develop a new surveillance initiative, the Childhood Immunization Coverage Survey in Key Populations (KPCICS) in Canada.
The core objective of this survey is to provide up-to-date childhood vaccine coverage data (e.g., on measles, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, COVID-19) specific to the 2SLGBTQI+ and MSM populations. The survey will assess parent/legal guardian/other person most knowledgeable's (PMK; e.g., child's step-parent, adoptive parent, foster parent, sister or brother, grandparent or relative caring for and responsible for health decisions for the child) opinions and views on their child's immunization uptake, as well as vaccine hesitancy and vaccine refusal. This survey will also investigate the reasons for vaccine hesitancy among these populations and the impact this has on routine childhood immunization, for each population.
The second objective is to consider the unknown effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on concurrent childhood immunizations to determine priorities for vaccine-preventable diseases, with the aim of identifying whether catch-up routine immunization campaigns are required.
The surveillance project aims to collect information on:
To address the objectives of this surveillance project, an online survey was conducted with parents/legal guardians/other PMKs of children aged 0 to 17 years from specific at-risk populations, who live in Canada. The specific audiences included the following two (2) key at-risk populations. Parents/legal guardians/other PMKs aged 18 years and older, who have a child(ren) aged 0 to 17 years and who identify as:
A pilot test was conducted on March 29, 2023, to make sure the survey questionnaire was well understood by respondents. To do so, telephone interviews were conducted to obtain a better feel of the respondents' understanding of the questions. In total, 42 completed interviews were conducted in both official languages (21 in English and 21 in French). Interviews from the pilot test were not kept in the final database. After this pilot, several adjustments were made to questions based on the review of the interview recordings. Among those, some skip logic was adjusted on a few questions, some wording changes were applied to allow for better clarity and responses levels were added to some questions to capture what was seen in the "other (specify)" category.
Data collection was completed between August 3 to October 2, 2023. Respondents were offered an online survey through the use of Advanis' General Population Representative Sample (GPRS) and through Random digit dialing (RDD). Advanis sought a probability-based sample of 5,500 Canadian parents/guardians of children and adolescents younger than 18 years old living across Canada.
Over the past few years, Advanis has been developing its own proprietary General Population Random Sample (GPRS) using an IVR-to-Web and CATI-to-Web methodology. This sample includes about 600,000 Canadians. We use our proprietary interactive voice response (IVR) system and our in-house CATI call centre to conduct random digit dialing (RDD) to recruit respondents to be part of this sample. This method is probability-based; that is, every recruit has an equal and known chance of being invited to participate. We all typically call all the participants to prompt participation. We have found that this ensures a better distribution of the Canadian population. Advanis GPRS leverages a known probabilistic sampling method used by Statistics Canada, called multi-phase sampling. This approach involves collecting data from randomly selected sample units, and then collecting more data from a randomly selected subsampleFootnote 5.
So, unlike using traditional online panel samples, most of which is not randomly recruited (it is known as convenience sample), researchers can calculate the representativeness of the data collected from this sample with associated margins of error and can perform statistical testing on results. Furthermore, and unlike most traditional panel samples, all of Advanis' GPRS sample is a) new (the vast majority having been recruited since January 2018), and b) not "expert survey takers" since we survey each person no more than 8 times each year (our engagement is to not contact the same respondents within a minimum of a six week period) and do not provide incentives. Therefore, our respondents will not have been contacted by Advanis during the 30 day period for a survey. It is important to note that we only use this sample for the public sector and not-for-profit studies. As such, this method offers:
Advanis leveraged our General Population Random Sample to invite respondents to complete the survey online. All Advanis web surveys are hosted internally by Advanis, and they are online 24 hours a day. Because Advanis fields online surveys in-house, we can employ a rigorous and stringent set of data collection control mechanisms to ensure the highest quality for the data collected including:
The target audience for this project were 2SLGBTQI+ and MSM populations in Canada who are parents/legal guardians/other persons most knowledgeable (PMK; e.g., child's step-parent, adoptive parent, foster parent, sister or brother, grandparent or relative caring for and responsible for health decisions for the child) for a child(ren) aged 17 years or younger living across Canada. The targeted number of completed surveys was 5,500 Canadian parents/legal guardians/PMK (including 500 from the targeted populations and 5,000 from the general population). Questions within the survey further filtered out responses from anyone under the age of 18 years (S1) and responses for anyone who is not the parent/legal guardian of a child(ren) under the age of 18 (S2). A total of 5,576 responses were obtained (588 from 2SLGBTQI+ (including 4 MSM not 2SLGBTQI+), 164 MSM and 4,988 from the general population) to reach quotas, where possible (Table 1). As part of the expected 5,000 a notable proportion ended up being part of the 2SLGBTQI+ community. Since this was the main target of this study, the results actually provided more of the target population and slightly less of the general public.
Advanis also worked to obtain nationally representative coverage of the following key sub-populations:
The 2SLGBTQI+ were defined as anyone who identified as not heterosexual and cis-gendered. The MSM were any men that indicated having sexual intercourse with another man, regardless of whether or not they considered themselves part of the 2SLGBTQI+ community. For more information about the target populations, please refer to the note to reader section (Section 4).
As seen in Table 1, these targets were achieved.
Targeted population | Completed the survey | Minimum targets |
---|---|---|
MSM* | 164 | --- |
Not MSM (men only) | 2,467 | --- |
Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | 584 | --- |
Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | 4,887 | --- |
Part of 2SLGBTQI+ or MSM | 588 | 500 |
Not Part of 2SLGBTQI+ or MSM | 4,883 | 5,000 |
Unknown sexual orientation and behavior | 105 | --- |
Total | 5,576 | 5,500 |
|
Overall, 5,576 people completed the survey. Data are unweighted since the population proportions were not available for this exact population of parents. The census and the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) data cannot provide accurate population counts or proportions for the 2SLGBTQI+ population. For this reason, no statistical testing was applied.
Because being a parent and being a part of the 2SLGBTQI+ community is a central point of that study, it would be detrimental to have a weighting scheme that takes all 2SLGBTQI+ people into consideration. With only census data, it is impossible to account for gay cis men parents that are currently legally single, lesbian cis women that are currently legally single or any cis parents that are bisexual, pansexual, or other sexual orientation and either legally single or in a heteronormative relationship (opposite sex relationship). Those cases would need to be weighed as general population, skewing the analysis, and taking out of the analysis a part of the targeted population, hence the decision to not weigh the data.
It would be a very far-fetched estimation to match parents from the census and the CCHS and control potential biases that can be included by an indirect approach like this.
The survey draft and the French translations were provided by PHAC. Advanis worked with PHAC to refine the questionnaire. This was supported by the pilot testing that provided further insight into the challenges of the questionnaire. The survey was programmed using SurveyBuilder, a software program that is proprietary to Advanis. The surveys were available to be completed online.
The online survey was compatible with both desktop computers and mobile devices (tablets and smartphones). The surveys were housed on a website hosted by Advanis.
The surveys were designed to include multiple-choice questions, single response questions, including scaled, open-ended, and demographic questions. Skip logic was applied throughout, including thank-you messages used for the screening out of ineligible participants (not having a child under 18 living in the household, not a legal parent/guardian/PMK, refusing to provide their children's age). The survey was thoroughly pre-tested to ensure that skip patterns and survey questions were correctly programmed. The survey included the following sections:
The survey length was just over 13 minutes, exceeding the expected length of 10 minutes.
Invitations and reminders were sent by SMS or email. All SMS or emails were sent grouped by province to ensure that they were sent out during appropriate hours within each time zone. After sending the initial invitation, a reminder message was sent three days later to applicants who did not complete a survey or who were not screened out of the survey.
In total, 27,150 potential participants were invited to the studies (valid sample). Of these, 2,360 were screened out because they did not qualify and 7,144 refused to participate. In total, 11,739 ended up not answering the survey and 331 dropped off at various points. The global response rate to the study is 29.2%Footnote 6. The estimated margin of error is 1.31% at a 95% confidence interval.
Each survey had a unique number embedded in the hyperlink to eliminate the possibility of duplicate responses from one participant.
All Advanis Web surveys are hosted internally by Advanis, and we employ a rigorous and stringent set of data collection control mechanisms to ensure the highest quality for the data collected, including:
Data cleaning primarily involved creating variables tailored to the distinct populations, facilitating straightforward analysis for each group. Any "Other, specify" comments were carefully reviewed and integrated into existing levels where applicable. Additionally, new categories were introduced to the questions based on specify responses, ensuring that "Other" responses remained under 10%. The following variables were recoded (either with new categories or in existing buckets).
|
|
|
There are a few limitations to consider in this study:
Also noteworthy is the fact that the 2SLGBTQI+ group and the MSM group are not mutually exclusive. The "not MSM" group excludes women for a better comparison of this target group.
MSM definition: The definition is men having sex with men or any men that mentioned having sex with men in the sexual orientation question. If the men mentioned being heterosexual but still reported having sex with men, we considered their sexual behavior rather than sexual orientation.
2SLGBTQ+ definition: The 2SLGBTQI+ were defined as anyone who identified as not heterosexual and cis-gendered.
Results in the tables include nonresponse levels like "I don't know' and "I prefer not to answer", except in some cases where responses to these levels were 0% are not shown in the report. Results may also not total 100% due to rounding or where multiple responses could be provided. Results with a base of fewer than 30 respondents should also be interpreted with caution.
When reporting on aggregated categories in this report, the percentage can show a variation of +/- 1% due to rounding.
In addition to this report, three banner tables were provided to PHAC for the purposes of sub-group analyses. The banners had the following crosstabs for analysis:
It is to be noted that "Don't know" and "Prefer not to answer" categories were included in the banners. All numbers for respondents and percentages are unweighted in the banners. The data was rounded so that no decimals were shown and results with a base of 10 or below were suppressed. Some NET variables were requested by the research team and are included in the banners.
Non-response bias occurs when non-responders differ in a meaningful way from respondents and this difference impacts the information gathered. It is difficult to assess the presence of non-response bias since information about why non-responders did not participate is usually unavailable. That said, one way to gauge the potential impacts of non-response bias is to evaluate if the sample is presentative by comparing the respondents' characteristics and gauge if they reflect known population characteristics. In this case, the data was not available.
Where possible, we can check the distribution of respondents across various demographics (e.g., age and gender) and geographic categories and compare those distributions against known population characteristics. If the variation is fairly small and we have no reason to believe there are other factors impacting respondents' willingness to participate, we can conclude that the likelihood of non-response bias impacting the information gathered in the study is minimal. Several strategies were employed to increase response rates and reduce the effects of non-response bias. This includes:
The sample of respondents is composed of 5,576 parents or legal guardians or person most knowledgeable of a child(ren). For the remainder of this report, we will refer to them as parents.
2SLGBTQI+ parents predominantly fall within the 35 to 44 year age range (43%), followed with the age range 45 to 54 (32%). MSM parents are equally distributed across the 35 to 44 and 45 to 54 age groups (37% for both).
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
18-24 | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 1% |
25-29 | 1% | 1% | 4% | 0% | 2% |
30-34 | 4% | 3% | 11% | 2% | 8% |
35-44 | 40% | 40% | 43% | 37% | 37% |
45-54 | 43% | 45% | 32% | 46% | 37% |
55-64 | 9% | 9% | 8% | 12% | 12% |
65+ | 2% | 2% | 1% | 3% | 3% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
age_combined - How old are you? (S1 and S1a - both variables combined) |
About 13% of 2SLGBTQI+ parents describe their physical health as "excellent," 32% as "very good," 36% as "good," and 13% as "fair." Additionally, about 17% of MSM parents report "excellent" physical health, 35% report "very good", 32% report "good", and 11% report "fair".
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Excellent | 16% | 16% | 13% | 17% | 17% |
Very good | 38% | 38% | 32% | 37% | 35% |
Good | 34% | 34% | 36% | 34% | 32% |
Fair | 9% | 9% | 13% | 8% | 11% |
Poor | 3% | 2% | 5% | 3% | 5% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
b3 - In general, how would you describe your physical health? |
About 11% of 2SLGBTQI+ parents describe their mental health as "excellent," 23% as "very good," 32% as "good," 23% as "fair," and 11% as "poor."
Approximately 18% of MSM parents report "excellent" mental health, 30% report "very good", 26% report "good", 18% report "fair", and 9% report "poor".
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Excellent | 16% | 16% | 11% | 21% | 18% |
Very good | 33% | 34% | 23% | 35% | 30% |
Good | 32% | 32% | 32% | 28% | 26% |
Fair | 14% | 13% | 23% | 12% | 18% |
Poor | 4% | 4% | 11% | 3% | 9% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
b4 - In general, how would you describe your mental health? |
2SLGBTQI+ parents (44%) tend to be parents of one child, as are MSM parents (43%)— only slightly higher than the proportions of 2SLGBTQI+ (41%) and MSM (40%) parents who are parents of two children.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 39% | 38% | 44% | 35% | 43% |
2 | 44% | 44% | 41% | 47% | 40% |
3 | 13% | 14% | 10% | 14% | 11% |
4 or more | 4% | 4% | 5% | 4% | 6% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
s3 - How many children under the age of 18 are you a parent/legal guardian/person most knowledgeable of? |
Two-thirds (66%) of 2SLGBTQI+ parents indicated that their sex at birth was female, and just under one-third (32%) indicated male. A vast majority (93%) of MSM parents indicated that their sex at birth was male; 5% indicated female.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female | 52% | 51% | 66% | 2% | 5% |
Male | 47% | 49% | 32% | 97% | 93% |
Other | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 1% |
I prefer not to answer | 1% | 0% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
a4 - What was your sex at birth? |
Among 2SLGBTQI+ parents, 60% self-identified as women, 26% as men, 7% as non-binary, 1% as transgender women, 2% as transgender men, 2% as two-spirit/bi-spirit, and 3% as another gender.
Among MSM parents, 91% self-identified as cis-gender men, 3% as transgender men, and 5% as two-spirit/bi-spirit.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Woman (cis-gender female; my sex assigned at birth is the same as my current gender) | 51% | 51% | 60% | 0% | 0% |
Man (cis-gender male; my sex assigned at birth is the same as my current gender) | 45% | 48% | 26% | 96% | 91% |
Non-binary | 1% | 0% | 7% | 2% | 0% |
Transgender woman | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% |
Transgender man | 0% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 3% |
Two-spirit/bi-spirit | 0% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 5% |
Another gender | 0% | 0% | 3% | 1% | 0% |
I prefer not to answer | 3% | 1% | 0% | 2% | 0% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
s5 - What is your gender? |
15% of 2SLGBTQI+ parents self-identified as heterosexual, 44% as bisexual, 14% as pansexual, 10% as lesbian, 6% as gay, and 5% as asexual. Approximately 18% of MSM parents self-identified as heterosexual, 44% as bisexual, 13% as pansexual, and 22% as gay.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heterosexual ("straight") | 86% | 96% | 15% | 95% | 18% |
Bisexual | 5% | 0% | 44% | 0% | 44% |
Pansexual | 1% | 0% | 14% | 0% | 13% |
Lesbian | 1% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% |
Gay | 1% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 22% |
Asexual | 1% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 0% |
Other, please specify | 0% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 1% |
I prefer not to answer | 6% | 4% | 3% | 4% | 3% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
s6_r - What is your sexual orientation? |
Among 2SLGBTQI+ parents, 42% of their partners are women, 54% are men, 7% are non-binary, 4% are transgender women, 2% are transgender men, and 2% are two-spirit/bi-spirit. Among MSM parents, 54% of their partners are women, 52% are men, 7% are non-binary, 3% are transgender women, 1% are transgender men, and 5% are two-spirit/bi-spirit.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Woman (cis-gender female; sex assigned at birth is the same as their current gender) | 45% | 47% | 42% | 94% | 54% |
Man (cis-gender male; sex assigned at birth is the same as their current gender) | 47% | 47% | 54% | 1% | 52% |
Non-binary | 1% | 0% | 7% | 1% | 7% |
Transgender woman | 0% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 3% |
Transgender man | 0% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 1% |
Two-spirit/bi-spirit | 0% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 5% |
Not applicable | 4% | 3% | 9% | 2% | 5% |
I prefer not to answer | 5% | 3% | 4% | 3% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
s6b - What gender is (are) your sexual partner(s)? *This is a multi-level response question. The total can add up to more than 100%. |
Among 2SLGBTQI+ parents, over eight-in-ten (81%) self-identified as white. About three-quarters (74%) of MSM parents also self-identified as white.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
White (e.g., European, Caucasian) | 76% | 76% | 81% | 73% | 74% |
Black (African, Afro-Caribbean, African descent) | 6% | 6% | 5% | 6% | 7% |
East/Southeast Asian | 5% | 5% | 5% | 6% | 9% |
South Asian (e.g., Afghan, Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan) | 5% | 5% | 5% | 7% | 7% |
Middle Eastern and North African | 5% | 5% | 4% | 6% | 5% |
Latino/Latina (e.g., Latin American, Hispanic descent) | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 8% |
Indigenous (First Nations, Métis and/or Inuit) | 3% | 2% | 6% | 2% | 5% |
Other, please specify | 2% | 2% | 3% | 2% | 3% |
I prefer not to answer | 4% | 3% | 3% | 4% | 3% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
a10 - Which of the following best describes the racial or ethnic community that you belong to? *This is a multi-level response question. The total can add up to more than 100%. |
Among 2SLGBTQI+ parents, over one-half (52%) have completed a university degree or higher, and one-fifth (21%) have a college, CEGEP, or other non-university certificate or diploma.
Almost six-in-ten (56%) of MSM parents have completed a university degree or higher, one-in-ten (10%) have a university certificate or diploma, and almost one-fifth (19%) have a college, CEGEP, or other non-university certificate or diploma.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Less than a high school diploma or equivalent | 1% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 2% |
High school diploma or equivalent | 7% | 7% | 11% | 8% | 9% |
Registered apprenticeship or other trade certificate or diploma | 5% | 5% | 4% | 7% | 3% |
College/CEGEP or other non-university certificate or diploma | 21% | 21% | 21% | 21% | 19% |
University certificate or diploma below bachelor's level | 7% | 6% | 8% | 7% | 10% |
University – bachelor's degree or equivalent | 28% | 29% | 25% | 28% | 29% |
University – post-graduate degree above bachelor's level or equivalent | 30% | 30% | 27% | 27% | 27% |
Other, please specify | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
I prefer not to answer | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
a5 - What is the highest level of formal education that you have completed? |
In 2022, almost one-quarter of 2SLGBTQI+ parents' households made between $100,000 and $150,000, and $150,000 or more (23% and 24%, respectively). In the same year, almost one-quarter (23%) of MSM parents' households made between $100,000 and $150,000, and almost one-third (32%) made $150,000 or more.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Under $20,000 | 2% | 2% | 5% | 1% | 4% |
$20,000 to just under $40,000 | 4% | 3% | 7% | 2% | 5% |
$40,000 to just under $60,000 | 7% | 6% | 10% | 6% | 9% |
$60,000 to just under $80,000 | 8% | 7% | 10% | 7% | 7% |
$80,000 to just under $100,000 | 12% | 12% | 15% | 13% | 14% |
$100,000 to just under $150,000 | 24% | 24% | 23% | 25% | 23% |
$150,000 and above | 38% | 40% | 24% | 41% | 32% |
I prefer not to answer | 7% | 6% | 5% | 5% | 6% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
a6 - Please indicate your total household income, before taxes and deductions, for the year ending December 31, 2022. |
Almost one-quarter (24%) of 2SLGBTQI+ parents are single parents. For MSM parents, this rate is 16%.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | 16% | 15% | 24% | 11% | 16% |
No | 82% | 84% | 74% | 88% | 82% |
I prefer not to answer | 2% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 2% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
s7 - Are you a single parent? |
A vast majority of 2SLGBTQI+ (90%) and MSM (88%) parents do not live in a community with a population of fewer than 1,000 people.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | 5% | 5% | 8% | 6% | 11% |
No | 93% | 94% | 90% | 93% | 88% |
I don't know | 1% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 0% |
I prefer not to answer | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
a11 - Do you live in a community with a population of fewer than 1,000 people? |
Over one-half (55%) of 2SLGBTQI+ and MSM parents live in Ontario and under one-fifth (17% and 18%, respectively) live in Quebec. Just over one-tenth (13%) live in British Columbia.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlantic | 3% | 2% | 5% | 2% | 2% |
Quebec | 21% | 22% | 17% | 21% | 18% |
Ontario | 60% | 60% | 55% | 61% | 55% |
Prairies | 5% | 4% | 10% | 5% | 11% |
British Columbia | 12% | 11% | 13% | 11% | 13% |
Territories | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
region_net - region_net - Region for banners |
Almost one-half of 2SLGBTQI+ parents (45%) and MSM parents (47%) randomly selected children aged between 12 years and 17 years.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) under 6 months | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
(2) 6 months to 2y and a half | 3% | 3% | 5% | 3% | 3% |
(3) 2y and a half to 5y | 8% | 8% | 13% | 7% | 14% |
(4) 5y to 11y | 39% | 39% | 37% | 40% | 35% |
(5) 12y to 17y | 49% | 49% | 45% | 49% | 47% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
SelectedChild |
Among 2SLGBTQI+ parents, about 87% are a birth parent. Eight-in-ten (80%) MSM parents are a birth parent.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Birth parent | 93% | 94% | 87% | 94% | 80% |
Other Relationship | 7% | 6% | 13% | 6% | 20% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
b1 - What is your relationship to [child's nickname]? |
Among 2SLGBTQI+ parents, 96% of their children reside within the household. About 91% of MSM parents' children reside in the household.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | 97% | 98% | 96% | 97% | 91% |
No | 2% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 8% |
I prefer not to answer | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
b5 - Does [child's nickname] currently live in your household (primary or secondary residence)? |
One-half of 2SLGBTQI+ and MSM's (50% for both) children were female at birth.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female | 48% | 48% | 50% | 48% | 50% |
Male | 50% | 51% | 48% | 50% | 49% |
I don't know | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 1% |
I prefer not to answer | 2% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 0% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
a1 - What was [child's nickname]'s sex at birth? |
The majority of 2SLGBTQI+ parents' children are white (80%), as are 70% of MSM parents' children.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
White (e.g., European, Caucasian) | 76% | 77% | 80% | 73% | 70% |
East/Southeast Asian | 7% | 7% | 7% | 8% | 10% |
Black (African, Afro-Caribbean, African descent) | 6% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 5% |
South Asian (e.g., Afghan, Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan) | 5% | 5% | 5% | 7% | 7% |
Middle Eastern and North African | 5% | 5% | 3% | 5% | 3% |
Latino/Latina (e.g., Latin American, Hispanic descent) | 4% | 4% | 3% | 3% | 7% |
Indigenous (First Nations, Métis and/or Inuit) | 3% | 3% | 8% | 3% | 9% |
Other, please specify | 3% | 3% | 2% | 3% | 1% |
I prefer not to answer | 3% | 3% | 3% | 4% | 3% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
a2 - Which of the following best describes the racial or ethnic community that [child's nickname] belongs to? *This is a multi-level response question. The total can add up to more than 100%. |
Around 96% of children, whose parent responded as 2SLGBTQI+, have been vaccinated, and 95% of children whose parent responded as MSM, have been vaccinated at some point.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | 94% | 94% | 96% | 92% | 95% |
No | 5% | 5% | 3% | 6% | 3% |
I don't know | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
I prefer not to answer | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
c1 - Has [child's nickname] ever been vaccinated? |
Generally, most children have received all recommended childhood vaccinations. Among the 96% of 2SLGBTQI+ parents who said their child had been vaccinated at some point, seven-in-ten children (70%) have received "all" of their recommended vaccinations, while about 28% have received "some" vaccinations. Among the 95% of MSM parents who said their child had been vaccinated at some point, over seven-in-ten (71%) reported they have received "all" of their recommended vaccinations, and about 27% have received "some" vaccinations.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | 68% | 68% | 70% | 67% | 71% |
Some | 30% | 30% | 28% | 30% | 27% |
None | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
I prefer not to answer | 1% | 1% | 0% | 1% | 1% |
I don't know | 1% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 1% |
Base | 5,304 | 4,647 | 565 | 2,321 | 159 |
c2 - To the best of your knowledge, would you say that [child's nickname] has received all, some, or none of the recommended vaccines as of today? |
For children who received "some" or "none" of the vaccines recommended for their age group and those who answered "I don't know", over two-fifths of children with a 2SLGBTQI+ parent (43%) have not received the seasonal influenza (flu) shot, and about the same proportion (41%) have not received the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. Under two-fifths of children with an MSM parent have not received the flu (36%) or HPV (30%) vaccination.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diphtheria, Tetanus and Pertussis (DTaP, Tdap or Td) | 5% | 5% | 4% | 6% | 4% |
Haemophilus influenzae Type b (Hib) | 12% | 12% | 10% | 11% | 16% |
Hepatitis B (Hep B or HB) | 17% | 17% | 16% | 15% | 18% |
Hepatitis A and B (HAHB) (*Only recommended in Quebec) | 21% | 21% | 21% | 18% | 20% |
Meningococcal | 11% | 11% | 11% | 12% | 11% |
Pneumococcal | 11% | 11% | 11% | 10% | 7% |
Polio (IPV) | 6% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 7% |
Rotavirus (Rota) | 12% | 12% | 13% | 11% | 9% |
Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) (*Only recommended in Northwest Territories and Nunavut) | 31% | 32% | 30% | 27% | 18% |
Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) | 5% | 5% | 4% | 5% | 2% |
Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) | 8% | 8% | 5% | 8% | 2% |
Varicella (Var) | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 2% |
Human Papillomavirus (HPV) | 38% | 39% | 41% | 32% | 30% |
Seasonal influenza (flu) | 46% | 47% | 43% | 40% | 36% |
Don't know | 26% | 25% | 27% | 35% | 38% |
I prefer not to answer | 6% | 5% | 4% | 6% | 4% |
Base | 1,664 | 1,452 | 166 | 744 | 45 |
c2a - Which of the following recommended vaccines has [child's nickname] not received? *This is a multi-level response question. The total can add up to more than 100%. |
Most 2SLGBTQI+ parents (69%) and MSM parents (75%) reported that they have not experienced obstacles that made it difficult to get their child vaccinated with one or more of the recommended vaccines.
When obstacles have been encountered, the main obstacles indicated by 2SLGBTQI+ and MSM parents include the child's fear of needles (12% and 11%, respectively), difficulty booking time for the vaccination (11% and 9%, respectively), and parental opposition (4% and 5%, respectively).
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No obstacles | 73% | 73% | 69% | 75% | 75% |
My child fears needles | 9% | 9% | 12% | 7% | 11% |
Difficult to book time off work/ school for a vaccine appointment | 9% | 8% | 11% | 7% | 9% |
At least one parent opposed it | 5% | 5% | 4% | 6% | 5% |
Do not have access to a doctor | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 2% |
Health concerns/Allergy/medical conditions | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 0% |
Hard keeping track/hard finding information/do not know what vaccines are necessary | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 0% |
Live in a remote area (limited transportation) | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 2% |
Concerns about racism or discrimination towards your child | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 1% |
Language barriers (e.g., lack of access to relevant information in my preferred language) | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 1% |
Other, please specify | 4% | 4% | 5% | 4% | 3% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
c4_r - What obstacles if any, have made it more difficult to get [child's nickname] vaccinated with one or more of the recommended childhood vaccines? *This is a multi-level response question. The total can add up to more than 100%. |
For those with a child who did not receive all recommended vaccines for their age group, over one-quarter (28%) of 2SLGBTQI+ parents and over one-fifth (21%) of MSM parents indicated they did not consider it necessary for their child.
About 18% of 2SLGBTQI+ parents are concerned about the risk of vaccine side effects, as are 14% of MSM parents. Approximately 16% of 2SLGBTQI+ and 26% of MSM parents did not know that one or more vaccines were important for their child to receive.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I did not consider it necessary for my child | 35% | 36% | 28% | 33% | 21% |
Concerns about the risk of side effects of vaccines | 20% | 20% | 18% | 19% | 14% |
I did not know that one or more of these vaccines was important for my child to get | 15% | 15% | 16% | 17% | 26% |
Not confident in the effectiveness of vaccines | 14% | 15% | 10% | 13% | 12% |
Not of age yet / It's not the time yet | 10% | 10% | 13% | 7% | 5% |
Religious or philosophical reasons | 4% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 2% |
Health care system accessibility | 4% | 4% | 4% | 3% | 2% |
My child has or had a pre-existing medical condition | 3% | 2% | 4% | 2% | 0% |
Fear of needles | 1% | 1% | 2% | 0% | 0% |
Other, please specify | 6% | 6% | 10% | 6% | 7% |
I don't know | 10% | 10% | 9% | 14% | 19% |
I prefer not to answer | 5% | 4% | 5% | 6% | 5% |
Base | 1,605 | 1,402 | 158 | 699 | 43 |
c5_r - For what reason(s) has [child's nickname] not been immunized with one or more recommended childhood vaccines? *This is a multi-level response question. The total can add up to more than 100%. |
Among parents who said that child received "some" or "all" of the recommended childhood vaccines, around seven-in-ten 2SLGBTQI+ parents (72%) and MSM parents (66%) cited protecting their children and/or others from disease as a reason their child received immunizations.
Over one-half of 2SLGBTQI+ parents (52%) and nearly five in ten MSM parents (49%) said they vaccinated their child because the benefits of immunizations are more important than the risks. Advice from their doctor or health care professional was mentioned by 42% of 2SLGBTQI+ parents and 46% of MSM parents.
Over one-quarter of 2SLGBTQI+ parents (26%) and MSM parents (27%) said this was because it is necessary for their child to enter daycare or school. Fewer of 2SLGBQI+ parents and MSM parents mentioned they feared they might regret it later (10% and 8%, respectively).
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
To protect my child, myself or others from disease | 68% | 68% | 72% | 65% | 66% |
Benefits are more important than risks | 47% | 46% | 52% | 44% | 49% |
Advice from my doctor or health care professional | 41% | 41% | 42% | 41% | 46% |
Need it for daycare or school entry | 25% | 25% | 26% | 26% | 27% |
I fear I may regret it later if I don't | 7% | 6% | 10% | 6% | 8% |
I know or knew someone who got a vaccine-preventable disease | 5% | 4% | 8% | 4% | 3% |
Advice from a friend or a family member | 3% | 3% | 6% | 3% | 6% |
Other, please specify the reason | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
I don't know | 1% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 2% |
I prefer not to answer | 1% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 1% |
Base | 5,184 | 4,550 | 554 | 2,245 | 156 |
c7_r - Why did [child's nickname] receive one or more recommended childhood immunizations? *This is a multi-level response question. The total can add up to more than 100%. |
Overall, around one-tenth (13%) of MSM parents are or have been hesitant to vaccinate their child with the recommended immunizations. Under one-fifth (17%) of 2SLGBTQI+ parents are or have been hesitant to vaccinate their child with the recommended childhood vaccines.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | 21% | 21% | 17% | 18% | 13% |
No | 77% | 78% | 80% | 80% | 84% |
I don't know | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
I prefer not to answer | 2% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 2% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
c9a - Are you or have you been hesitant to vaccinate [child's nickname] with one or more recommended childhood immunizations? |
Among 2SLGBTQI+ parents and MSM parents who were or are hesitant to vaccinate their child with recommended childhood vaccines, over six-in-ten (61% and 62%, respectively) have concerns about the safety of the vaccine and/or side effects. About 43% of MSM parents have concerns about the effectiveness of the vaccine, as do 35% of 2SLGBTQI+ parents.
For 27% of 2SLGBTQI+ parents, mistrust in vaccine-related information was a reason for hesitancy. This rate was 29% for MSM parents. Almost one-quarter (24%) of MSM parents wanted to discuss the vaccine with their child's health care practitioner before immunizing their child, as do one-fifth (21%) of 2SLGBTQI+ parents.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Concerns about the safety of the vaccine(s) and/or side effects | 66% | 67% | 61% | 65% | 62% |
Concerns about the effectiveness of the vaccine(s) | 33% | 33% | 35% | 34% | 43% |
Mistrust in vaccine-related information | 30% | 30% | 27% | 35% | 29% |
I wanted to discuss the vaccine(s) with my child's health care practitioner | 12% | 12% | 21% | 11% | 24% |
My child is not at risk for infection | 11% | 12% | 5% | 12% | 0% |
Religions or philosophical reasons | 9% | 9% | 11% | 10% | 14% |
My child had a bad experience with previous vaccines | 8% | 8% | 11% | 7% | 10% |
Do/did not know where to get reliable information | 7% | 7% | 13% | 8% | 14% |
My child had a bad experience with health care providers | 2% | 2% | 4% | 1% | 10% |
Concerns about racism or discrimination | 1% | 0% | 3% | 1% | 5% |
Other, please specify | 5% | 5% | 5% | 4% | 0% |
I prefer not to answer | 3% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 0% |
Don't know | 1% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 0% |
Base | 1,153 | 1,006 | 101 | 439 | 21 |
c10_r - For what reasons were/are you hesitant and/or decided not to get [child's nickname] immunized for one or more recommended childhood immunizations? *This is a multi-level response question. The total can add up to more than 100%. |
Among 2SLGBTQI+ parents, almost three-quarters (74%) said that their child has received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine (7% have received one dose, 37% have received two doses, and 30% have received three doses or more). Among MSM parents, almost one-in-eight (77%) said that their child has received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine (6% have received one dose, 39% have received two doses, and 32% have received three doses or more).
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
None | 23% | 22% | 23% | 21% | 18% |
At least one dose | 74% | 75% | 74% | 76% | 77% |
1 dose | 6% | 6% | 7% | 7% | 6% |
2 doses | 40% | 41% | 37% | 40% | 39% |
3 doses or more | 28% | 28% | 30% | 28% | 32% |
I don't know | 1% | 1% | 2% | 2% | 4% |
I prefer not to answer | 2% | 2% | 1% | 2% | 1% |
Base | 5,279 | 4,604 | 589 | 2,302 | 172 |
c3 - How many doses of the Health Canada approved COVID-19 vaccines has [child's nickname] received? |
Among those whose children received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine, 71% of 2SLGBTQI+ and 71% of MSM parents cited protecting themselves and/or household members against COVID-19 infection as a reason to have vaccinated their child. For both 2SLGBTQI+ and MSM parents, almost seven-in-ten (67%) based their decision to immunize their child against COVID-19 on public health recommendations. Almost six-in-ten (57%) MSM parents and seven-in-ten (66%) of 2SLGBTQI+ parents indicated their child received a COVID-19 vaccine to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in their community.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
To protect themselves and/or household members against COVID-19 infection | 66% | 66% | 71% | 63% | 71% |
Based on public health recommendations | 61% | 60% | 67% | 59% | 67% |
To prevent the spread of COVID-19 in my community | 58% | 58% | 66% | 55% | 57% |
To help restore a more normal life (e.g., to lift public health measures, participate in extra-curricular activities, travel) | 57% | 57% | 53% | 55% | 48% |
To protect themselves against long COVID | 45% | 44% | 54% | 41% | 43% |
The COVID-19 vaccine was recommended by a health care professional | 33% | 33% | 35% | 33% | 30% |
Other, please specify | 1% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 1% |
I prefer not to answer | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% |
Base | 3,919 | 3,468 | 416 | 1,750 | 122 |
c8_r - Why did [child's nickname] receive a COVID-19 vaccine? *This is a multi-level response question. The total can add up to more than 100%. |
Approximately four in ten of 2SLGBTQI+ parents (38%) and one-third MSM parents (30%) are or have been hesitant to vaccinate their child against COVID-19.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | 42% | 42% | 38% | 41% | 30% |
No | 55% | 55% | 60% | 56% | 67% |
I don't know | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
I prefer not to answer | 2% | 2% | 1% | 2% | 1% |
Base | 5,530 | 4,847 | 578 | 2,449 | 162 |
c9b - Are you or have you been hesitant to vaccinate [child's nickname] against COVID-19? |
Among 2SLGBTQI+ and MSM parents who are or have been hesitant to vaccinate their child against COVID-19, about 59% of 2SLGBTQI+ parents and 55% of MSM parents attribute their hesitation to vaccinate their child against COVID-19 to a lack of research on childhood vaccination. More than half cited concerns about the safety and/or side effects of COVID-19 vaccines (56% of 2SLGBTQI+ parents and 61% of MSM parents). Around two-fifths of 2SLGBTQI+ and MSM parents (40% and 45%, respectively) are concerned about the effectiveness of these vaccines.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Concerns that not enough research on the vaccine has been done in children | 62% | 62% | 59% | 63% | 55% |
Concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and/or side effects | 61% | 62% | 56% | 62% | 61% |
Concerns about the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines | 44% | 44% | 40% | 47% | 45% |
Mistrust in COVID-19 vaccine-related information | 38% | 37% | 37% | 42% | 43% |
Do/did not consider it is/was necessary | 32% | 32% | 32% | 35% | 31% |
My child already had a COVID-19 infection | 25% | 25% | 29% | 22% | 27% |
My child is not at risk of getting COVID-19 or at risk of severe infection | 22% | 22% | 19% | 26% | 14% |
I want(ed) to first discuss COVID-19 vaccines with my child's health care practitioner | 6% | 6% | 8% | 5% | 8% |
My child fears needles | 5% | 5% | 6% | 5% | 8% |
Religious or philosophical reasons | 5% | 5% | 8% | 3% | 4% |
My child had a bad experience with previous vaccinations | 3% | 3% | 5% | 2% | 10% |
Concerns about racism or discrimination | 1% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 2% |
My child had a bad experience with health care providers | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 2% |
Other, please specify | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 2% |
I prefer not to answer | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 0% |
I don't know | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% |
Base | 2,326 | 2,049 | 219 | 1,011 | 49 |
c11_r - For what reasons were/are you hesitant and/or decided not to get a COVID-19 vaccine for [child's nickname]? *This is a multi-level response question. The total can add up to more than 100%. |
Over six-in-ten 2SLGBTQI+ parents (67%) and MSM parents (63%) said they "definitely will" vaccinate their child with recommended childhood vaccines in the future (excluding the COVID-19 vaccines). Around one-fifth of 2SLGBTQI+ and MSM parents (19% and 22%, respectively) said they "probably will."
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Definitely will | 62% | 62% | 67% | 59% | 63% |
Probably will | 21% | 21% | 19% | 24% | 22% |
Probably won't | 5% | 6% | 3% | 6% | 4% |
Definitely won't | 5% | 5% | 3% | 5% | 4% |
Not applicable, my child has received all recommended childhood vaccines | 3% | 3% | 4% | 3% | 4% |
I don't know | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 3% |
I prefer not to answer | 2% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d1a - Excluding the COVID-19 vaccines, how likely it is that you will get [child or children] vaccinated with the recommended childhood vaccines in the future? |
Among parents of a child 6 months of age or older, about two-fifths of 2SLGBTQI+ parents (38%) and MSM parents (40%) said they "definitely will" get their child vaccinated against COVID-19 in the future. Under one-quarter of 2SLGBTQI+ parents (24%) and MSM parents (22%) said they "probably will" get their child vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine in the future.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Definitely will | 27% | 26% | 38% | 27% | 40% |
Probably will | 24% | 24% | 24% | 24% | 22% |
Probably won't | 20% | 20% | 16% | 19% | 18% |
Definitely won't | 20% | 20% | 15% | 22% | 14% |
I don't know | 7% | 8% | 6% | 5% | 6% |
I prefer not to answer | 2% | 2% | 1% | 2% | 1% |
Base | 5,530 | 4,847 | 578 | 2,449 | 162 |
d1b - How likely is it that you will get [child's nickname] vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine in the future? |
A total of 33% of 2SLGBTQI+ parents indicated that, since the COVID-19 pandemic, their views about vaccines have changed (23% "somewhat agree" with this statement and 10% "strongly agree"). Most 2SLGBTQI+ parents (62%) did not change their views about vaccines since the COVID-19 pandemic (42% "strongly disagree" with this statement and 20% "somewhat disagree").
Over one-third of MSM parents agree (36%) that, since the COVID-19 pandemic, their views about vaccines have changed (24% "somewhat agree" and 12% "strongly agree"). Most MSM parents (59%) did not change their views about vaccines since the pandemic (40% "strongly disagree" with this statement and 19% "somewhat disagree").
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly agree | 15% | 16% | 10% | 18% | 12% |
Somewhat agree | 23% | 23% | 23% | 24% | 24% |
Somewhat disagree | 20% | 21% | 20% | 19% | 19% |
Strongly disagree | 37% | 37% | 42% | 34% | 40% |
I prefer not to answer | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% |
I don't know | 3% | 3% | 3% | 2% | 4% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d2_a - In general, my views about vaccines have changed since the COVID-19 pandemic. : Please rate your level of agreement with the statements below |
Before the COVID-19 pandemic, over nine-in-ten 2SLGBTQI+ parents (92%) believed that vaccines were safe for children (71% "strongly agree" and 20% "somewhat agree"). Around 7% of 2SLGBTQI+ parents disagreed (5% "somewhat disagree", 2% "strongly disagree") with the statement.
More than nine-in-ten MSM parents (91%) believed that vaccines were safe for children before the COVID-19 pandemic (74% "strongly agree" and 18% "somewhat agree"). A total of 6% of MSM parents disagreed (4% "somewhat disagree", 2% "strongly disagree") with the statement.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly agree | 65% | 65% | 71% | 64% | 74% |
Somewhat agree | 25% | 26% | 20% | 27% | 18% |
Somewhat disagree | 4% | 4% | 5% | 4% | 4% |
Strongly disagree | 3% | 3% | 2% | 3% | 2% |
I prefer not to answer | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 2% |
I don't know | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d2_b - Before the COVID-19 pandemic, I believed that vaccines were safe for children. : Please rate your level of agreement with the statements below |
Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the majority of 2SLGBTQI+ parents (93%) (73% "strongly agree" and 21% "somewhat agree") believed that vaccines were effective for children. The proportion of 2SLGBTQI+ parents who disagreed with the statement was 6% (4% "somewhat disagree", 2% "strongly disagree").
The majority of MSM parents (93%) believed that vaccines were effective for children before the COVID-19 pandemic (70% "strongly agree" and 23% "somewhat agree"). A total of 5% of MSM parents disagreed (4% "somewhat disagree", 1% "strongly disagree") with the statement.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly agree | 70% | 70% | 73% | 68% | 70% |
Somewhat agree | 23% | 23% | 21% | 25% | 23% |
Somewhat disagree | 3% | 3% | 4% | 3% | 4% |
Strongly disagree | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 1% |
I prefer not to answer | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
I don't know | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d2_c - Before the COVID-19 pandemic, I believed that vaccines were effective for children. : Please rate your level of agreement with the statements below |
Almost seven-in-ten 2SLGBTQI+ parents (66%) and MSM parents (68%) cited they would be most likely to consult health care providers as a source of information on childhood immunization. Around six-in-ten of 2SLGBTQI+ and MSM parents (61% and 58%, respectively) said they would be most likely to consult the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) or Health Canada (HC). The regional Ministry of Health was mentioned by over two-fifths of parents (46% of 2SLGBTQI+ parents and 45% of MSM parents).
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Health care providers | 65% | 66% | 66% | 63% | 68% |
Public Health Agency of Canada or Health Canada | 53% | 53% | 61% | 50% | 58% |
Ministry of Health within my province or territory | 42% | 42% | 46% | 42% | 45% |
Scientific publications, journals | 42% | 41% | 46% | 42% | 39% |
My local public health unit/clinic | 37% | 37% | 44% | 36% | 42% |
International organizations (e.g., World Health Organization (WHO)) | 31% | 30% | 42% | 27% | 37% |
National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) | 20% | 19% | 24% | 19% | 24% |
Community nursing stations or clinics | 16% | 15% | 23% | 16% | 20% |
News/media | 14% | 14% | 13% | 14% | 18% |
Family/friends | 12% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 15% |
Social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook) | 4% | 4% | 3% | 5% | 4% |
Other, please specify | 5% | 5% | 4% | 6% | 4% |
I prefer not to answer | 2% | 2% | 1% | 2% | 1% |
I don't know | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d3_r - Which of the following sources of information would you be most likely to consult in order to find information about childhood immunization? *This is a multi-level response question. The total can add up to more than 100%. |
For the greater proportion of 2SLGBTQI+ parents and MSM parents (both 90%), vaccines are safe.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
True | 87% | 88% | 90% | 87% | 90% |
False | 5% | 5% | 4% | 6% | 5% |
I don't know | 5% | 5% | 4% | 5% | 4% |
I prefer not to answer | 3% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d4_a - In general, vaccines are safe. : To the best of your knowledge, please rate whether the following statements about childhood immunizations are true or false. |
For the vast majority of 2SLGBTQI+ (91%) and MSM parents (90%), vaccines are effective.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
True | 88% | 88% | 91% | 87% | 90% |
False | 5% | 5% | 3% | 6% | 5% |
I don't know | 5% | 5% | 4% | 5% | 4% |
I prefer not to answer | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d4_b - In general, vaccines are effective. : To the best of your knowledge, please rate whether the following statements about childhood immunizations are true or false. |
For over two-thirds of 2SLGBTQI+ (70%) and MSM parents (75%), COVID-19 vaccines are safe.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
True | 62% | 62% | 70% | 62% | 75% |
False | 18% | 18% | 13% | 21% | 12% |
I don't know | 16% | 17% | 14% | 15% | 11% |
I prefer not to answer | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 2% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d4_c - In general, COVID-19 vaccines are safe. : To the best of your knowledge, please rate whether the following statements about childhood immunizations are true or false. |
For many 2SLGBTQI+ (66%) and MSM parents (67%), COVID-19 vaccines are effective.
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
True | 58% | 58% | 66% | 58% | 67% |
False | 23% | 23% | 16% | 27% | 17% |
I don't know | 16% | 16% | 16% | 13% | 13% |
I prefer not to answer | 3% | 3% | 2% | 2% | 2% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d4_d - In general, COVID-19 vaccines are effective. : To the best of your knowledge, please rate whether the following statements about childhood immunizations are true or false. |
Over nine-in-ten 2SLGBTQI+ parents agree that vaccines help protect their child's health (74% "strongly agree" and 21% "somewhat agree"). About 2% "somewhat disagree" and 2% "strongly disagree". Most MSM (95%) parents also agree that vaccines help protect their child's health (71% "strongly agree" and 24% "somewhat agree"). Among MSM parents 2% "somewhat disagree" and 2% "strongly disagree".
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly agree | 67% | 68% | 74% | 65% | 71% |
Somewhat agree | 24% | 24% | 21% | 26% | 24% |
Somewhat disagree | 3% | 3% | 2% | 4% | 2% |
Strongly disagree | 3% | 3% | 2% | 3% | 2% |
I don't know | 2% | 2% | 1% | 2% | 1% |
I prefer not to answer | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d5_a - In general, vaccines help to protect my child's health. : Rate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about childhood immunizations. |
Almost one-half (48%) of 2SLGBTQI+ parents agree that they are concerned about the potential side effects from vaccines (17% "strongly agree" and 32% "somewhat agree"). The same proportion (49%) disagree (31% "somewhat disagree" and 18% "strongly disagree").
Over one-half (53%) of MSM parents agree that they are concerned about potential side effects from vaccines (16% "strongly agree" and 37% "somewhat agree"). About 44% disagree (29% "somewhat disagree" and 15% "strongly disagree").
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly agree | 20% | 20% | 17% | 22% | 16% |
Somewhat agree | 35% | 36% | 32% | 35% | 37% |
Somewhat disagree | 27% | 27% | 31% | 25% | 29% |
Strongly disagree | 16% | 16% | 18% | 16% | 15% |
I don't know | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 2% |
I prefer not to answer | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d5_b - In general, I am concerned about the potential side effects from vaccines. : Rate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about childhood immunizations. |
Over one-in-ten 2SLGBTQI+ parents (11%) agree that the use of alternative practices, such as homeopathy or naturopathy, can eliminate the need for vaccination (3% "strongly agree" and 8% "somewhat agree"). Over eight-in-ten (81%) disagree (12% "somewhat disagree" and 69% "strongly disagree").
Similarly, 12% of MSM parents agree that the use of alternative practices, such as homeopathy or naturopathy, can eliminate the need for vaccination (1% "strongly agree" and 10% "somewhat agree"). Almost eight-in-ten (79%) disagree (11% "somewhat disagree" and 68% "strongly disagree").
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly agree | 4% | 4% | 3% | 4% | 1% |
Somewhat agree | 9% | 9% | 8% | 10% | 10% |
Somewhat disagree | 17% | 18% | 12% | 18% | 11% |
Strongly disagree | 61% | 61% | 69% | 60% | 68% |
I don't know | 7% | 7% | 6% | 8% | 8% |
I prefer not to answer | 2% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d5_c - The use of alternative practices, such as homeopathy or naturopathy, can eliminate the need for vaccination. : Rate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about childhood immunizations. |
Over one-in-ten (15%) 2SLGBTQI+ parents agree that a healthy lifestyle, such as healthy nutrition and hygiene, can replace the need for vaccination (5% "strongly agree" and 9% "somewhat agree"). Eight-in-ten (80%) disagree (17% "somewhat disagree" and 63% "strongly disagree").
Almost one-fifth of MSM parents (18%) agree that a healthy lifestyle can replace the need for vaccination (9% "strongly agree" and 10% "somewhat agree"). Almost eight-in-ten (78%) disagree (21% "somewhat disagree" and 57% "strongly disagree").
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly agree | 7% | 7% | 5% | 9% | 9% |
Somewhat agree | 13% | 13% | 9% | 16% | 10% |
Somewhat disagree | 21% | 22% | 17% | 23% | 21% |
Strongly disagree | 54% | 54% | 63% | 49% | 57% |
I don't know | 3% | 3% | 4% | 3% | 3% |
I prefer not to answer | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d5_d - In general, a healthy lifestyle such as healthy nutrition and hygiene can replace the need for vaccination. : Rate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about childhood immunizations. |
2SLGBTQI+ parents overwhelmingly agree (91%) that vaccinating their child helps protect the health of others (73% "strongly agree" and 18% "somewhat agree"). Only 7% disagree (3% "somewhat disagree" and 4% "strongly disagree").
About the same proportion of MSM parents (88%) also agree that vaccinating their child helps protect other's health (69% "strongly agree" and 19% "somewhat agree"). Only 9% disagree (3% "somewhat disagree" and 6% "strongly disagree").
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly agree | 63% | 63% | 73% | 58% | 69% |
Somewhat agree | 22% | 23% | 18% | 25% | 19% |
Somewhat disagree | 6% | 6% | 3% | 8% | 3% |
Strongly disagree | 6% | 6% | 4% | 7% | 6% |
I don't know | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% |
I prefer not to answer | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d5_e - Having my child vaccinated helps to protect the health of others in my family and/or community. : Rate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about childhood immunizations. |
Most 2SLGBTQI+ parents agree (73%) that most parents in their community have their children vaccinated with all recommended vaccines (40% "strongly agree" and 32% "somewhat agree"). Only 8% disagree (6% "somewhat disagree" and 2% "strongly disagree").
Similarly, almost three-quarters (73%) of MSM parents agree most other parents in the community have fully vaccinated their children (39% "strongly agree" and 34% "somewhat agree"). Only 8% disagree (5% "somewhat disagree" and 3% "strongly disagree").
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly agree | 39% | 40% | 40% | 37% | 39% |
Somewhat agree | 37% | 37% | 32% | 38% | 34% |
Somewhat disagree | 5% | 5% | 6% | 6% | 5% |
Strongly disagree | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 3% |
I don't know | 16% | 16% | 18% | 16% | 17% |
I prefer not to answer | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d5_f - Most parents in my community have their children vaccinated with all recommended vaccines: Rate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about childhood immunizations. |
Under one-third of 2SLGBTQI+ parents agree (28%) that children receive too many vaccines in the same visit (11% "strongly agree" and 18% "somewhat agree"). Over one-half (59%) disagree (29% "somewhat disagree" and 30% "strongly disagree").
Again, under one-third (27%) of MSM parents agree that children receive too many vaccines in the same visit (7% "strongly agree" and 21% "somewhat agree"). Over one-half (58%) disagree (30% "somewhat disagree" and 27% "strongly disagree").
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly agree | 12% | 12% | 11% | 10% | 7% |
Somewhat agree | 19% | 19% | 18% | 18% | 21% |
Somewhat disagree | 29% | 30% | 29% | 30% | 30% |
Strongly disagree | 25% | 24% | 30% | 23% | 27% |
I don't know | 14% | 14% | 11% | 17% | 13% |
I prefer not to answer | 2% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 2% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d5_g - Children receive too many vaccines at the same visit. : Rate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about childhood immunizations. |
About one-fifth of 2SLGBTQI+ parents agree (22%) that children receive too many vaccines overall (10% "strongly agree" and 12% "somewhat agree"). Over seven-in-ten (71%) disagree (23% "somewhat disagree" and 48% "strongly disagree").
Again, about one-fifth of MSM parents agree (22%) that children receive too many vaccines overall (10% "strongly agree" and 12% "somewhat agree"). Almost seven-in-ten (68%) disagree (23% "somewhat disagree" and 46% "strongly disagree").
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly agree | 11% | 11% | 10% | 10% | 10% |
Somewhat agree | 14% | 14% | 12% | 15% | 12% |
Somewhat disagree | 26% | 26% | 23% | 27% | 23% |
Strongly disagree | 39% | 39% | 48% | 37% | 46% |
I don't know | 9% | 9% | 6% | 10% | 9% |
I prefer not to answer | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d5_h - Children receive too many vaccines, overall. : To the best of your knowledge, please rate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about childhood immunizations. |
About one-fifth of 2SLGBTQI+ parents agree (22%) that it's better to develop immunity from having a disease rather than from a vaccine (9% "strongly agree" and 13% "somewhat agree"). Seven-in-ten (70%) disagree (21% "somewhat disagree" and 49% "strongly disagree").
One-quarter (25%) of MSM parents agree that immunity from a disease is better than immunity from a vaccine (13% "strongly agree" and 12% "somewhat agree"). Almost seven-in-ten (67%) disagree (22% "somewhat disagree" and 45% "strongly disagree").
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly agree | 10% | 9% | 9% | 11% | 13% |
Somewhat agree | 18% | 18% | 13% | 20% | 12% |
Somewhat disagree | 25% | 25% | 21% | 24% | 22% |
Strongly disagree | 37% | 36% | 49% | 34% | 45% |
I don't know | 9% | 9% | 7% | 9% | 7% |
I prefer not to answer | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d5_i - It is better to develop immunity from having a disease rather than from a vaccine. : Rate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about childhood immunizations. |
Almost three-quarters of 2SLGBTQI+ parents agree (74%) that delaying child vaccines causes risks to their health (43% "strongly agree" and 31% "somewhat agree"). Over one-in-ten (16%) disagree (11% "somewhat disagree" and 4% "strongly disagree").
Eight-in-ten MSM parents agree (80%) that delaying child vaccines causes risks to their health (43% "strongly agree" and 37% "somewhat agree"). Over one-in-ten (14%) disagree (9% "somewhat disagree" and 5% "strongly disagree").
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly agree | 37% | 36% | 43% | 37% | 43% |
Somewhat agree | 32% | 32% | 31% | 33% | 37% |
Somewhat disagree | 12% | 13% | 11% | 13% | 9% |
Strongly disagree | 8% | 8% | 4% | 8% | 5% |
I don't know | 10% | 10% | 9% | 9% | 5% |
I prefer not to answer | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d5_j - Delaying child vaccines causes risks to their health. : Rate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about childhood immunizations. |
Almost eight-in-ten 2SLGBTQI+ parents agree (78%) that unvaccinated children are at a higher risk of getting some serious diseases, including COVID-19 (58% "strongly agree" and 20% "somewhat agree"). Under one-fifth (17%) disagree (9% "somewhat disagree" and 9% "strongly disagree").
Again, almost eight-in-ten MSM parents agree (77%) that children are at a higher risk of getting serious diseases (59% "strongly agree" and 19% "somewhat agree"). Under one-fifth (17%) disagree (7% "somewhat disagree" and 10% "strongly disagree").
Total | Not part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Part of 2SLGBTQI+ | Not MSM | MSM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly agree | 47% | 47% | 58% | 45% | 59% |
Somewhat agree | 25% | 26% | 20% | 25% | 19% |
Somewhat disagree | 10% | 10% | 9% | 11% | 7% |
Strongly disagree | 10% | 10% | 9% | 12% | 10% |
I don't know | 5% | 5% | 4% | 4% | 4% |
I prefer not to answer | 2% | 2% | 1% | 2% | 1% |
Base | 5,576 | 4,887 | 584 | 2,467 | 164 |
d5_k - Unvaccinated children are at higher risk of getting some serious diseases, including COVID-19: Rate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about childhood immunizations. |
Most children with 2SLGBTQI+ or MSM parents have been vaccinated at least once (96% for those with 2SLGBTQI+ parents and 95% for those with MSM parents). A majority of those who received at least one vaccine also received all the recommended vaccines (71% for those with 2SLGBTQI+ parents and 71% for those with MSM parents).
Although most did not encounter obstacles when trying to get vaccinated, a child's fear of needles and the difficulty to book time off work or school for a vaccine appointment were the main obstacles mentioned by both 2SLGBTQI+ and MSM parents.
The main reasons for deciding not to get their child vaccinated or for being hesitant towards vaccination were concerns about the safety of the vaccine(s) or their side effects (61% for those with hesitant 2SLGBTQI+ parents and 62% for those with hesitant MSM parents).
Regarding the COVID-19 vaccine specifically, among 2SLGBTQI+ parents, almost three quarters (74%) said that their child has received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. It is also the case for 77% of MSM parents. The main reasons for hesitancy regarding the COVID-19 vaccine were concerns that not enough research has been done on the vaccine in children and concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and/or side effects.
Hello, this is [enter name] calling from TellCityHall. We are conducting an online study about emerging public health topics in Canada on behalf of The Public Health Agency of Canada. Can I send you a TEXT with a link to the study to complete when you have time?
I can also send the survey link by EMAIL. Can I send you an email with a link to the survey? We will only send you a message for the purposes of administering this specific survey.
If asked; the online survey will take approximately 10 minutes depending on your answers.
We would be happy to put you on our do-not-call list. Thank you for your time today.
We will send you the study via text message or email and you can complete it when it's more convenient.
You've completed a study for us in the past, and said you might participate in public policy surveys in the future. TellCityHall is a public policy initiative of Advanis, a market and social research company. Tell City Hall is a service that provides survey information to all levels of government and non-profits. All of your responses are completely anonymous and only group results will be reported. The study can be completed on a smartphone, tablet, or computer.
Si vous préférez répondre à l'étude en français, veuillez cliquer sur français dans le coin supérieur droit.
This public health study is sponsored by the Public Health Agency of Canada and is focused on knowledge, attitudes, and experiences about childhood immunization for key populations. Advanis (http://advanis.net) (opens in a new window) is conducting the research on behalf of the Public Health Agency of Canada. TellCityHall is one of Advanis' data collection methods.
It will take approximately 10 minutes to complete and is voluntary and confidential. Your responses will not be linked to any personally identifiable information, to protect your anonymity.
For more information about this survey and how the data will be used, please see below. If you agree to participate in this survey, please click on the following button to continue:
Participation in this study is voluntary and you can withdraw at any time. There will be no consequences if you decide not to participate. You may skip questions that you do not feel comfortable answering by clicking "Prefer not to answer", where applicable. You may also complete the survey in several sessions and from different devices. If you are interrupted while doing the survey, you can click on the same link to pick up right where you left off. Once data has been collected, please note that researchers have no way of knowing which data belongs to which participant. The results from partially completed or abandoned surveys will be deleted.
You will be asked some demographic questions and questions related to childhood vaccines. Please note that certain questions will be asked at the start of the survey to determine if you are eligible to participate. If you are not eligible to participate, your data will be removed and destroyed.
By participating, you are helping to generate data which will help to improve the health and well-being of children from key Canadian populations by providing public health authorities with the information they need to ensure health equity.
You will be asked questions, such as age, gender, sexual orientation and ethnicity in order to better understand knowledge, attitudes, and experiences across different key populations. You will also be asked about the first three characters of your postal code to help determine your geographic area for sampling purposes. Your home address cannot be identified through this information. We will not ask you to provide us with any information that could directly identify you, such as name(s), or date of birth and data will be stored on password-protected computers. However, in exceptional circumstances, individual responses in combination with other available information could lead to identifying you. The protection of your personal information is very important to us, and we will make every effort to safeguard it and reduce the risk that you are identified.
It is possible that some questions may be triggering to some people. Risks to participants will be minimized by providing a note before these questions appear. You have the right to skip any questions you are not comfortable answering.
The information you provide to the Public Health Agency of Canada is collected by the Centre for Immunization Surveillance under the authority of section 4 of the Department of Health Act and Section 3 of the Public Health Agency of Canada Act and handled in accordance with the Privacy Act.
The survey firm, Advanis, will be responsible for collecting survey data from all participants. Once data collection is complete, Advanis will provide the Public Health Agency of Canada with a dataset that will not include any individual responses to reduce the risk that you could be identified. All the responses received will be grouped for analysis and presented in grouped form. The dataset will also be available to federal and provincial governments, organizations, and researchers across Canada, if requested. Any reports or publications produced based on this research will use grouped data and will not identify you or link you to these survey results.
Your answers will remain anonymous and the information you provide will be administered according to the requirements of the Privacy Act, the Access to Information Act, and any other pertinent legislation. Click to view our privacy policy (http://www.tellcityhall.ca/privacy.html) (opens in a new window).
You have a right to complain to the Privacy Commissioner of Canada if you feel your personal information has not been handled properly.
For any questions or concerns about the survey or the information we are collecting, or if you require technical support (including accessibility requirements or to request that the survey be completed over the phone), please e-mail: (survey+parents@tellcityhall.ca).
For more information about routine and catch-up immunization for infants and children in Canada click here (https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/provincial-territorial-immunization-information/provincial-territorial-routine-vaccination-programs-infants-children.html) (opens in a new window).
This survey is registered with the Canadian Research Insights Council's (CRIC) Research Verification Service. The project verification number is: 20230803-AD829. Click here (opens in a new window) (https://www.canadianresearchinsightscouncil.ca/rvs/home/) to verify the legitimacy of this survey.
How old are you? Minimum: 16, Maximum: 120
For our analysis of the data, we need to know your age category. Can you tell us your age group?
Term1 Show if Under 18 OR under 18 group or refused ((S1) OR (S1a = 1,I prefer not to answer))
Thank you for your interest but for this survey, you must be 18 years of age or older.
Status Code: 501
Are you a parent or legal guardian or person most knowledgeable of a child(ren) under the age of 18?
The person most knowledgeable may include the child's step-parent, adoptive parent, foster parent, sister or brother, grandparent or other relative caring for the child and responsible for health decisions for the child.
Term2 Show if Not parent OR refuse (S2 = 0,I prefer not to answer)
Thank you for your interest, but for this survey, we are looking for people who are parents or legal guardians or the person most knowledgeable of a child under the age of 18.
Status Code: 502
In the following questions, we are interested in your general health status.
In general, how would you describe your physical health?
In general, how would you describe your mental health?
How many children under the age of 18 are you a parent/legal guardian/person most knowledgeable of?
For our analysis of the data, we need to know how many children under the age of 18 you are the parent/legal guardian/person most knowledgeable of.
Are you sure you don't want to give this information?
Term3 Show if NoChildren OR Refused to tell ((S3 = 0) OR (S3b = 1))
Thank you for your interest, but for this survey, we are looking for people who are parents or legal guardians or the person most knowledgeable of a child under the age of 18.
Status Code: 503
We now have some questions about your child(ren) who is(are) under 18 years of age.
How old is each child, starting with the oldest child?
During the survey we would like to ask you about your child who is [under 6 months / 6 months to less than 2 and a half years / 2 and a half years to less than 5 years / 5 years to less than 12 years / 12 years to less than 18 years] old. If you have more than one child in this age group, please think of the [youngest / oldest].
In order to simplify your responses for the rest of the survey, please provide their initial(s) or a nickname which will be used to refer to this child throughout the survey. This information will not be kept or associated with any of your responses. It will only be used for you as a reference as you are completing this survey.
Please do not use your child's full name
What is your relationship to ‹‹B0.text››?
Does ‹‹B0.text›› currently live in your household (primary or secondary residence)?
What is the exact age of ‹‹B0.text››?
What is the exact age of ‹‹B0.text››?
What is the exact age of ‹‹B0.text››?
What is the exact age of ‹‹B0.text››?
The next set of questions are about public health topics relating to children. For these questions, please only consider health experiences that apply to ‹‹B0.text››.
Has ‹‹B0.text›› ever been vaccinated?
Refers to recommended childhood vaccines as well as COVID-19 vaccines.
(if Selected Child Under6months (SelectedChild = 1)) The following immunizations are recommended in Canada for children aged under 6 months:
(if 6monthslessthan2half (SelectedChild = 2)) The following immunizations are recommended in Canada for children aged 6 months to less than 2 and a half years:
(if 2halflessthan5 (SelectedChild = 3)) The following immunizations are recommended in Canada for children aged 2 and a half years to less than 5 years:
(if Child5to11 (SelectedChild = 4)) The following immunizations are recommended in Canada for children aged 5 years to less than 12 years:
(if Child12to17 (SelectedChild = 5)) The following immunizations are recommended in Canada for children aged 12 years to less than 18 years:
More information can be found here: Canada provincial territorial immunization information (https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/provincial-territorial-immunization-information/provincial-territorial-routine-vaccination-programs-infants-children.html)
To the best of your knowledge, would you say that ‹‹B0.text›› has received all, some, or none of these recommended vaccines as of today?
Which of the following recommended vaccines has ‹‹B0.text› not received?
Select all that apply
What obstacles if any, have made it more difficult to get ‹‹B0.text›› vaccinated with one or more of the recommended childhood vaccines?
Please select all that apply.
Levels marked with * are randomized
For what reason(s) has ‹‹B0.text›› not been immunized with one or more recommended childhood vaccines?
Please exclude COVID-19 vaccines. Please select all that apply.
Levels marked with * are randomized
Why did ‹‹B0.text›› receive one or more recommended childhood immunizations?
Please exclude COVID-19 vaccines. Please select all that apply.Levels marked with * are randomized
Are you or have you been hesitant to vaccinate ‹‹B0.text›› with one or more recommended childhood immunizations?
Vaccine hesitancy refers to a reluctance or delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite availability.
Please exclude COVID-19 vaccines.
For what reasons were/are you hesitant and/or decided not to get ‹‹B0.text›› immunized for one or more recommended childhood immunizations?
Please exclude COVID-19 vaccines. Please select all that apply.
Levels marked with * are randomized
How many doses of the Health Canada approved COVID-19 vaccines has ‹‹B0.text›› received?
Moderna Spikevax and Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty are approved vaccines for use in children aged 6 months and older; and Novavax Nuvaxovid is an approved vaccine for use in children of age 12 years and older
Why did ‹‹B0.text›› receive a COVID-19 vaccine?
Select all that applyLevels marked with * are randomized
(SelectedChild > 1)
Are you or have you been hesitant to vaccinate ‹‹B0.text›› against COVID-19?
Vaccine hesitancy refers to a reluctance or delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite availability.
For what reasons were/are you hesitant and/or decided not to get a COVID-19 vaccine for ‹‹B0.text››?
Please select all that apply.
Levels marked with * are randomized
(if Part of 2SLGBTQ+ or MSM or FSF ((S6 = 1,2,3,4,6,7) OR (S5 = 3,4,5,6,7) OR (((S6 = 5,7,I prefer not to answer) AND (S5 = 2,5)) AND (S6b_2 = 1 OR S6b_5 = 1)) OR (((S5 = 1,4) AND (S6 = 5,7,I prefer not to answer))
We are interested in understanding how the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced your perspective on recommended childhood vaccines.
Excluding the COVID-19 vaccines, how likely it is that you will get [‹‹B0.text›› / your children / your child] vaccinated with the recommended childhood vaccines in the future?
How likely is it that you will get ‹‹B0.text›› vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine in the future?
Currently, Moderna Spikevax and Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty are approved vaccines for use in children aged 6 months and older; and Novavax Nuvaxovid is an approved vaccine for use in children of age 12 years and older in Canada.How likely is it that you will get ‹‹B0.text›› vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine in the future if it becomes available?
Please rate your level of agreement with the statements below:
1. In general, my views about vaccines have changed since the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, I believed that vaccines were safe for children.
3. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, I believed that vaccines were effective for children.
Which of the following sources of information would you be most likely to consult in order to find information about childhood immunization?
Please select all that apply.
Levels marked with * are randomized
To the best of your knowledge, please rate whether the following statements about childhood immunizations are true or false.
To the best of your knowledge, please rate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about childhood immunizations:
In order to better understand the diversity of the Canadian population, as well as to help achieve greater equity and diversity in public health, we would like to ask you a few questions about you and your child's general background. We acknowledge that some of these questions might result in uncomfortable feelings.
Remember that all the information you provide for the following questions is completely anonymous and will be kept confidential.
What was ‹‹B0.text››'s sex at birth?
Which of the following best describes the racial or ethnic community that ‹‹B0.text›› belongs to? We recognize this list of racial or ethnic identifiers may not exactly match how you would describe your child.
Please select all that apply to your child.
Now, we would like to ask you some questions about your general background.
What was your sex at birth?
What is your gender?
Gender refers to your current gender which may be different from sex assigned at birth and may be different from what is indicated on legal documents.
What is your sexual orientation?
What gender is (are) your sexual partner(s)?
Select all that apply
Our racial and ethnic identities may shape how we are treated by different individuals and institutions.
Which of the following best describes the racial or ethnic community that you belong to? We recognize this list of racial or ethnic identifiers may not exactly match how you would describe yourself.
Please select all that apply to you.What is the highest level of formal education that you have completed?
Please indicate your total household income, before taxes and deductions, for the year ending December 31, 2022.
Your total household income consists of the total amount of money earned by all household members.
Are you a single parent?
Do you live in a community with a population of fewer than 1,000 people?
So we can classify responses based on where people live, please enter the first three digits of your postal code.
Note that we cannot identify your address from this information since the first three digits of your postal code are not residence-specific.
In which province or territory do you reside?
NonIndigenous Show if not indigenous ((custom: ‹‹current_mode_is("web")››) AND (A10_3 != 1))
This is the end of the survey. On behalf of the Public Health Agency of Canada, we would like to thank you for participating in this survey. Your responses will provide invaluable and insightful information about childhood immunization coverage in Canada.
Wellness Together Canada (https://www.wellnesstogether.ca/en-CA/about) offers free live counselling through Homewood Health, 24 hours a day. To speak to someone, call 1-866-585-0445.
Indigenous Show AND indigenous (A10_3 = 1)
This is the end of the survey. On behalf of the Public Health Agency of Canada, we would like to thank you for your participation. Your responses will provide valuable and insightful information about immunization in Indigenous communities across Canada.
The First Peoples Wellness Circle (FPWC) is a national not-for-profit corporation governed and managed by Indigenous Leaders and exists to improve the lives of Canada's First Peoples by addressing healing, wellness and other mental health challenges. Call 1-833-311-FPWC (3792)
Hope for Wellness Helpline (https://www.hopeforwellness.ca/) is available 24/7 to all Indigenous people across Canada. Telephone and online counselling are available in English and French. Additional languages can be requested.
Call the toll-free Help Line: 1-855-242-3310 or connect to the online chat at hopeforwellness.ca
Status Code: -1
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-627-m/11-627-m2021062-eng.htm
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7085112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7085112/#R25
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/edu/power-pouvoir/ch13/prob/5214899-eng.htm
POR response rate formula: (R) 5576 participants + 2360 screened out / (U) 11739 + (IS) 7475 + (R) 5576 participants + 2360 screened out
Flu Shot Inquiry: The question regarding whether or not the child has received a flu shot framed within the current immunization status. Responses to this question might yield varied responses due to the annual nature of the flu shot. Some individuals may not consider last year's flu vaccine if they haven't received this year's, introducing potential response variations that will require revision in later cycles of the survey.