[Previous] [Table of Contents] [Next]
Date of Latest Version: October 2006, updated February 2010
Note: This is a new annex being released with the 2006 version of the Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan.
Summary of Significant Changes:
Since 2004, Canadian public health surveillance stakeholders, through national working groups, have been defining the roles and responsibilities as well as the minimum standards associated with the collection of national surveillance data during interpandemic and pandemic periods.
The ability to adapt to rapidly evolving situations must be emphasized in all surveillance guidelines. It follows that this annex is part of an ongoing and evolving preparedness plan. It is recognized that while the current published version outlines high-level surveillance guidelines, further detail is required in order to provide comprehensive national guidelines, in particular, a more detailed description of streamlined surveillance activities for phase 6. Therefore, the annex should be considered with the following list of next steps:
The overall goals of influenza pandemic preparedness and response are First, to minimize serious illness and overall deaths, and second to minimize societal disruption among Canadians as a result of an influenza pandemic.
The strategies used to achieve these goals will depend on a number of factors, including the epidemiology of the pandemic. Determination of epidemiologic parameters and indicators is critical for informing the public health response and policy decisions, defining research priorities and meeting international reporting obligations. As the pandemic progresses through each phase, the surveillance activities needed to guide public health actions will change from enhanced activities in the pandemic alert phases to streamlined activities at the height of the pandemic.
In this document, influenza surveillance guidelines, including data collection, collation, analysis and dissemination/communication issues for both disease and virologic surveillance, are outlined for each phase of the pandemic. In addition, detailed protocols for virologic surveillance and other laboratory procedures can be found in the laboratory annex of the Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan (Annex C).
This document has been prepared for pandemic planning purposes as well as to facilitate a standardized approach to national influenza surveillance during the interpandemic period. Although the characteristics of a novel influenza virus are not known, the experiences learned from SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), outbreaks of human infection with influenza A (H5N1) and pandemic H1N1 2009 have underscored the importance of planning and establishing a surveillance infrastructure capacity for the detection and monitoring of emerging respiratory infections. The following framework addresses planning for surveillance in general terms; however, it should be understood that while some of the recommended actions can be prepared for in advance, other situation-specific recommendations and alerts will need to be developed on the basis of information that will only be available as the pandemic evolves. It should also be noted that specific surveillance strategies may be required for remote and isolated communities, including many First Nations and Inuit communities, to appropriately describe an outbreak in these regions.
Guidelines are necessary to ensure that data are collected in a standardized manner across jurisdictions in order to enable national level analysis and cross-jurisdictional comparison. The guidelines represent the minimum recommended activities required for national monitoring of the evolving pandemic. Provincial and territorial jurisdictions may choose, on the basis of their on own risk assessment and experience, to increase the sensitivity of surveillance activities (e.g. increased timeliness of data collection and reporting or use of more sensitive case definitions for monitoring) while respecting national health reporting standards. Further, as additional information becomes available during the course of the pandemic, monitoring and reporting activities may be refined as necessary. It is recognized that specific data needs, desired reporting frequency and availability of data may differ across pandemic influenza situations. It is also recognized that as a given pandemic evolves, the capacity to collect and report data may change. It is therefore recommended that a surveillance guidance document be produced in each pandemic situation that will build on and operationalize the recommendations given in this annex. Such a document will outline the data to be collected and reported under various levels of capacity (for example, shifts in capacity that may lead to a change from case-based, to line-listed, to aggregate data reporting), including a description of the minimum surveillance activities required to continue national monitoring of the pandemic. An example of an operationalized surveillance guidance document is provided in Appendix II.
The objectives of these guidelines are to assist federal, provincial and territorial (F/P/T) partners in the development or enhancement of surveillance activities; they are intended to facilitate the following:
Protocols for special studies that may be conducted during the pandemic should be developed and pre-tested in the interpandemic/pandemic alert periods, recognizing that refinements may be necessary at the time of a pandemic. It is recognized that these studies will most likely be conducted in parallel with other surveillance activities.
Special studies may include, but are not limited to, serological surveys of early cases/clusters of human infection with a novel influenza virus, the role of bacterial pathogens in the development of secondary complications and serious outcomes, and modes of transmission studies (e.g. in community or hospital-based settings).
In addition, targeted studies may be useful in supplementing routine surveillance data to assess the impact of the pandemic on the health care system as well as the social and economic impact. Even if conducted at the end of the pandemic wave, special studies may serve as a means of evaluating and refining various attempted interventions to lessen the impact of successive waves of the pandemic. Efforts should be made to ensure that special studies are planned and implemented in such a way as to complement and supplement existing surveillance data. Conducting a gap analysis of surveillance activities to determine the key questions that can and cannot be answered through established or planned surveillance activities can help to identify the areas of inquiry that may benefit from targeted study. Where possible, data should be collected through surveillance and research activities that will allow for analysis by social determinants, including sex, disability, income or other measure of socio-economic status, age and race/ethnicity.
Surveillance for pandemic influenza is expected to be founded on timely, representative and comprehensive surveillance activities that are the cornerstones of ongoing routine annual influenza surveillance:
Several additional activities are recommended for pandemic influenza surveillance, for both enhanced detection of early warning signals and monitoring during a pandemic:
The following tables describe the surveillance objectives, roles and responsibilities for public health stakeholders at each level of government (F/P/T and local). The tables are organized by successive phases of a pandemic according to the Canadian pandemic phases, reflecting both the global situation (phases 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, etc.) and the highest level of novel virus activity in Canada (sub-phases 3.1, 4.1, 5.1, etc.). See the Background Section of the Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for more details.
Note: In the description of the phases the term "animal" is used to cover both avian and mammalian species.
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
1.0 No new virus subtypes have been detected in humans. An influenza virus subtype that has caused human infection may be present in animals located outside Canada. If the virus is present in animals, the risk of human infection/disease is considered to be low. 1.1 No new virus subtypes have been detected in humans. An influenza virus subtype that has caused human infection is present in animals in Canada, but the risk of human infection/disease is considered to be low. 2.0 No new virus subtypes have been detected in humans. However, an animal influenza virus subtype that poses substantial risk to humans is circulating in animals located outside Canada. 2.1 No new virus subtypes have been detected in humans. However, an animal influenza virus subtype that poses substantial risk to humans is circulating in animals in Canada. |
Surveillance Objectives/Roles and Responsibilities |
Objectives
Federal
P/T/local
|
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
1.0 No new virus subtypes have been detected in humans. An influenza virus subtype that has caused human infection may be present in animals located outside Canada. If the virus is present in animals, the risk of human infection/disease is considered to be low. 1.1 No new virus subtypes have been detected in humans. An influenza virus subtype that has caused human infection is present in animals in Canada, but the risk of human infection/disease is considered to be low. 2.0 No new virus subtypes have been detected in humans. However, an animal influenza virus subtype that poses substantial risk to humans is circulating in animals located outside Canada. 2.1 No new virus subtypes have been detected in humans. However, an animal influenza virus subtype that poses substantial risk to humans is circulating in animals in Canada. |
National Surveillance Data |
Disease surveillance (a) influenza activity level by P/T region (based on FluWatch definitions) Laboratory surveillance (e) percent positive influenza tests (total number of laboratory tests for influenza and number of positive results, by virus type, A or B) Risk assessment (i) summary of national/international areas where animal virus activity has been confirmed |
Appendix II provides a pictorial representation of the national FluWatch influenza surveillance system.
Table 2 describes the surveillance objectives for the pandemic alert period. The objectives are general, given the unknown epidemiology of a novel influenza virus infection and uncertainties as to how the virus might behave in terms of efficiency of human-to-human transmission, impact on the population/population sub-groups and capacity to spread rapidly. Recommended surveillance tools and protocols, including surveillance case definitions, will need to be developed and revised according to information received as the situation evolves. The triggers that will signal the move to a new phase are generally based on relative ability to infect humans and spread efficiently among humans, as determined by observed activity and a comprehensive risk assessment. This risk assessment will include analyzing the interplay of these and other factors (e.g. infectiousness, rate of transmission, incubation period and period of communicability, severity of illness, impact of initial control measures). These factors should be viewed as general parameters that are useful for describing the critical points in the evolution and escalation of a pandemic and can only be assumed prior to strain identification and circulation of the novel virus. Furthermore, initial predictions are subject to change as the novel virus becomes adapted to human populations, and flexibility will be important to respond with rapid adjustment of surveillance and related activities.
The following tables provide a basic framework for establishing and maintaining the recommended surveillance infrastructure and for clarifying the basic roles and responsibilities for managing these activities at the various levels of government. As mentioned above, specific surveillance recommendations will vary by pandemic situation, thus it is recommended that a surveillance guidance document be developed in each pandemic situation to build on and operationalize these recommendations (see Appendix II for an example of an operational surveillance guidance document).
The ongoing maintenance and adjustment of routine surveillance activities and the timely sharing of surveillance and risk assessment information is an important supplement to the basic surveillance framework laid out in this annex. On the basis of ongoing risk assessment derived from the interpretation of local, regional, national and international influenza/emerging respiratory illness activity, recommendations may be made on an as-needed basis. These will guide increased vigilance and direct surveillance and investigation of severe and/or unexpected respiratory illnesses in relation to exposures of concern (high-risk travel locations, exposure settings or types of contact). Furthermore, monitoring and investigation activities may be adjusted in terms of sensitivity and specificity as dictated by the evolving situation. Factors that may influence the opportunity for initial containment of cases/isolated clusters, such as the length of the incubation period and efficiency of transmission, will contribute to the decision as to whether or not to continue case and cluster investigation with a view to controlling spread, if only temporarily, to buy additional time at the outset of a pandemic.6 The following framework should be considered with these factors in mind, underscoring the need for flexible, simple and proven activities/systems founded on good routine surveillance practices, clarified roles and responsibilities, and efficient use of resources.
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
3.0 Outside Canada human infection(s) with a new subtype are occurring, but no human-to-human spread or, at most, rare instances of spread to a close contact have been observed. No cases identified in Canada. |
Surveillance Objectives/Roles and Responsibilities |
Objectives
Federal
Additional roles/responsibilities for phase 3
P/T/local Additional roles/responsibilities for phase 3
|
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
3.1 Single human case(s) with a new subtype detected in Canada. Virus is not known to be spreading from human to human or, at most, rare instances of spread to a close contact have been observed |
Surveillance Objectives/Roles and Responsibilities |
Objectives
Federal
P/T/local
|
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
4.0 Outside Canada small cluster(s) with limited human-to-human transmission are occurring, but spread is highly localized, suggesting that the virus is not well adapted to humans. No cases identified with such cluster(s) have been detected in Canada. |
Surveillance Objectives/Roles and Responsibilities |
Objectives
Federal
Additional roles/responsibilities for phase 4
P/T/local
Additional roles/responsibilities for phase 4
|
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
4.1 Single human case(s) with virus that has demonstrated limited human-to-human transmission detected in Canada. No cluster(s) identified in Canada. 4.2 Small localized clusters with limited human-to-human transmission are occurring in Canada, but spread is highly localized, suggesting that the virus is not well adapted to humans. |
Surveillance Objectives/Roles and Responsibilities |
Objectives
Federal
Additional roles/responsibilities for phase 4.1, 4.2
P/T/local
Additional roles/responsibilities for phase 4.1, 4.2
|
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
5.0 Outside Canada larger cluster(s) are occurring, but human-to-human spread is still localized, suggesting that the virus is becoming increasingly better adapted to humans but may not yet be fully transmissible (substantial pandemic risk). No cases identified with such clusters have been detected in Canada. |
Surveillance Objectives/Roles and Responsibilities |
Objectives
Federal
P/T/local
|
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
5.1 Single human case(s), detected in Canada, with virus that is better adapted to humans. No cluster(s) identified in Canada. |
Surveillance Objectives/Roles and Responsibilities |
Objectives
Federal
P/T/local
|
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
5.2 Larger localized cluster(s) with limited human-to-human transmission are occurring in Canada, but human-to-human spread is still localized, suggesting that the virus is becoming increasingly better adapted to humans but may not yet be fully transmissible (substantial pandemic risk). |
Surveillance Objectives/Roles and Responsibilities |
Objectives
Federal
P/T/local
|
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
3.0 Outside Canada human infection(s) with a new subtype are occurring, but no human-to-human spread or, at most, rare instances of spread to a close contact have been observed. No cases identified in Canada. |
National Surveillance Data |
Disease surveillance (a) influenza activity level by P/T region (based on FluWatch definitions) Laboratory surveillance (e) percent positive influenza tests (total number of laboratory tests for influenza and number of positive results, by virus type, A or B) Risk assessment (i) summary of national/international areas where animal virus activity has been confirmed |
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
3.1 Single human case(s) with a new subtype detected in Canada. Virus is not known to be spreading from human-to-human or, at most, rare instances of spread to a close contact have been observed. |
National Surveillance Data |
Disease surveillance (a) influenza activity level by P/T region (based on FluWatch definitions) Laboratory surveillance (e) percent positive influenza tests (total number of laboratory tests for influenza and number of positive results, by virus type, A or B) Risk assessment (i) summary of national/international areas where animal virus activity has been confirmed In addition to indicators for 3.0 (k) detailed epidemiologic description and estimation of incubation and communicability periods (e.g. number of secondary cases) (may require special studies to address) |
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
4.0 Outside Canada small cluster(s) with limited human-to-human transmission are occurring, but spread is highly localized, suggesting that the virus is not well adapted to humans. No cases identified with such cluster(s) have been detected in Canada. 5.0 Outside Canada larger cluster(s) are occurring, but human-to-human spread is still localized, suggesting that the virus is becoming increasingly better adapted to humans but may not yet be fully transmissible (substantial pandemic risk). No cases identified with these clusters have been detected in Canada. |
National Surveillance Data |
Same data as 3.0 (a) influenza activity level by P/T region (based on FluWatch definitions) Laboratory surveillance (e) percent positive influenza tests (total number of laboratory tests for influenza and number of positive results, by virus type, A or B) Risk assessment (i) summary of national/international areas where animal virus activity has been confirmed |
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
4.1 Single human case(s) with virus that has demonstrated limited human-to-human transmission detected in Canada. No cluster(s) identified in Canada. 4.2 Small localized clusters with limited human-to-human transmission are occurring in Canada, but spread is highly localized, suggesting that the virus is not well adapted to humans. 5.1 Single human case(s) with virus that is better adapted to humans detected in Canada. No cluster(s) identified in Canada. 5.2 Larger localized cluster(s) with limited human-to-human transmission are occurring in Canada, but human-to-human spread is still localized, suggesting that the virus is becoming increasingly better adapted to humans but may not yet be fully transmissible (substantial pandemic risk). |
National Surveillance Data |
Same data as 3.1 (a) influenza activity level by P/T region (based on FluWatch definitions) Laboratory surveillance (e) percent positive influenza tests (total number of laboratory tests for influenza and number of positive results, by virus type, A or B) Risk assessment (i) summary of national/international areas where animal virus activity has been confirmed In addition to data for 3.1 (n) number and epidemiologic description of settings involved |
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
6.0 Outside Canada increased and sustained transmission in general population has been observed. No cases have been detected in Canada. |
Surveillance Objectives/Roles and Responsibilities |
Objectives
Federal
P/T/local
|
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
6.1 Single human case(s) with the pandemic virus detected in Canada. No cluster(s) identified in Canada. Note: It is likely that this phase will have a very short duration and may not occur at all in Canada (i.e. novel virus activity may not be detected prior to the occurrence of a cluster of cases). |
Surveillance Objectives/Roles and Responsibilities |
Objectives
Federal
P/T/local
|
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
6.2 Localized or widespread pandemic activity observed in Canadian population. |
Surveillance Objectives/Roles and Responsibilities |
Objectives
Federal
P/T/local
|
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
6.0 Outside Canada increased and sustained transmission in the general population has been observed. No cases have been detected in Canada. |
National Surveillance Data |
Disease surveillance (a) influenza activity level by P/T region (based on FluWatch definitions) Laboratory surveillance (e) percent positive influenza tests (total number of laboratory tests for influenza and number of positive results, by virus type, A or B) Risk assessment (i) summary of international activity in humans |
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
6.1 Single human case(s) with the pandemic virus detected in Canada. No cluster(s) identified in Canada. Note: It is likely that this phase will have a very short duration and may not occur at all in Canada (i.e. novel virus activity may not be detected prior to the occurrence of a cluster of cases). |
National Surveillance Data |
Same data as 5.1, 5.2 (a) influenza activity level by P/T region (based on FluWatch definitions) Laboratory surveillance Risk assessment In addition to data for 5.1, 5.2 NOTE: Currently, there is no mechanism for collecting mortality data on a real-time basis. This is a recognized gap in information for monitoring the severity of the pandemic. Mortality data are required during interpandemic phases to monitor the severity of annual influenza epidemics, to establish baseline expected seasonal mortality trends and to detect potential signals. The collection of real-time, or at minimum timely, mortality data is recommended at the height of a pandemic to describe the severity of the pandemic, identify high-risk age groups and provide crude indications of intervention effectiveness. As well, during this heightened phase of the pandemic, resources are expected to be scarce and, because of low participation/reporting rates, existing surveillance activities may no longer provide accurate or complete data. While routine surveillance activities are not expected to stop entirely, participation rates may be very low and therefore data quality and representativeness may be poor. Thus, simple and flexible systems for surveillance are key. In addition to routine activities that are established and maintained, new and recommended activities, such as real-time/timely mortality surveillance, should be simple and flexible. |
While the post-pandemic period suggests that the pandemic waves have ended and that the virus is no longer causing significant outbreaks in the population, it is acknowledged that the virus will continue to circulate. Table 4 outlines ways to evaluate the surveillance activities conducted during the pandemic; however, surveillance and laboratory activities in the post-pandemic period should continue to monitor changes in the pandemic virus.
Canadian Pandemic Phase |
Post-pandemic reports of case counts and other broad indicators of pandemic activity in Canada suggest that the pandemic virus is no longer causing significant illness in the population. |
Surveillance Objectives/Roles and Responsibilities |
Objectives
Federal
P/T/local
|
The questionnaire that follows was developed by the BC Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC) for use during the 2004 avian influenza H7N3 outbreak in British Columbia with input from scientists who were previously involved in the response to an avian influenza H7N7 outbreak in the Netherlands in 2003.
PDF Version
(6 Pages, 80 KB)
Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Surveillance Guidance Document for Provincial and Territorial Surveillance Partners
Last revision: February 2010
Contact:
Influenza Surveillance and Epidemiology Section
Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases
Public Health Agency of Canada
130 Colonnade Road Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0K9
Email: HSFLUEPI@phac-aspc.gc.ca
Disclaimer: The reporting guidelines are valid as of the last update and are subject to revision. Provinces, territories and other surveillance partners will be notified accordingly.
The influenza surveillance strategy in place this year (2009) differs substantially from previous seasons as Canada is currently in a phase 6 pandemic period. National guidance and reporting recommendations for the surveillance of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 will help to ensure that data submitted to the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) are standardized across the country in order to allow for comparison among jurisdictions and also allow Canada to meet World Health Organization (WHO) international reporting requirements.
This document aims to provide reporting guidance to our provincial and territorial surveillance partners in order to support standardized submission of data. It also includes reference information regarding other reporting sources that participate in the PHAC influenza surveillance program, and influenza protocols and data collection tools used by other participating partners.
The objectives of surveillance during a pandemic are to continually monitor and assess the progression of influenza virus so that effective public health measures can be adopted and evaluated in order to best reduce the burden of illness and societal disruption attributed to the disease. These objectives are based on the WHO Global Pandemic Influenza Surveillance Strategy and meet objectives developed in the Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan.
Specifically, the surveillance objectives are as follows:
National influenza surveillance is achieved by integrating information received from an extensive network of surveillance partners who provide PHAC with different pieces of the influenza picture and allow us to make a comprehensive assessment of influenza activity in Canada. Table 1 identifies these partners and provides a short description of the role they play in influenza surveillance.
The surveillance data provided by the provincial and territorial partners are crucial to the overall surveillance of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 and FluWatch. It is recommended that provincial and territorial partners report the recommended surveillance data in a timely manner as much as possible, although it is understood that the information is not always available in all provincial and territorial surveillance systems.
Any collection, use and disclosure of identifiable information by PHAC will be conducted in accordance with PHAC’s Policy for the Collection, Use and Dissemination of Public Health Data, dated June 2009.
Sources of information | Indicators | Description | Objectives |
---|---|---|---|
Provinces & territories | FluWatch Influenza activity, outbreaksH1N1-specific Hospitalizations, deathsSevere respiratory illness (SRI)Unusual events |
Provinces and territories report on influenza activity levels, number of outbreaks occurring in health care facilities and schools, and unusual activity.Provinces and territories report on all hospitalized cases and deaths on a weekly basis. | Monitor the geographic spread of the virus across Canada and trend over time.Monitor the trend of severe disease (hospitals, intensive care units [ICU] and deaths) occurrence in the community as it rises and falls within each province/territory and Canada.Estimate population-based hospitalization and mortality rates.Identify major groups at risk and provide information on the impact on the health care system.Monitor other severe clinical syndromes and how they differ from H1N1 cases.The objective of the real-time reporting of unusual events is to rapidly assess this signal and to determine whether further public health actions are warranted. |
Immunization Monitoring Program-Active (IMPACT) | Paediatric hospital-based surveillance (clinical and interventions information) |
Twelve tertiary care paediatric hospitals across Canada cover 90% of paediatric hospital beds. Report aggregate information about laboratory-confirmed influenza-related hospitalizations (by age group, type of influenza, date of admission) and deaths in children aged <16 years. Starting in the fall of 2009 they are to provide bi-weekly detailed case reports. |
IMPACT provides a detailed clinical description of the paediatric population affected by pandemic influenza (clinical presentation, bacterial complications, level of care needed). Evaluate the effectiveness of some interventions (vaccine, and to a lesser degree antivirals). Assess the impact that pandemic H1N1 in the paediatric population is having on the health care system. |
Canadian Nosocomial Infections Surveillance Program (CNISP) | Adult hospital-based surveillance (clinical and interventions information) | A network of 45 acute-care hospitals located across Canada reports on a weekly basis the number of all laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalizations and summarizes data from detailed case report forms on a monthly basis. Start date for all 45 hospitals is Sep 1, 2009. |
CNISP provides a detailed clinical description of the adult population affected by pandemic influenza (clinical presentation, bacterial complications, level of care needed). Evaluate the effectiveness of some interventions (vaccine, and to a lesser degree antivirals). Assess the impact that pandemic H1N1 in the adult population is having on the health care system. |
National Research System (NaReS)- The College of Family Physicians of Canada Provincial/territorial networks | Community influenza-like illness (ILI) surveillance | A network of approximately 300 physicians or community health centres from across the country report weekly on ILI activity in their practice. | Monitor the trend of ILI occurrence in the community as it rises and falls within each province/territory and Canada. |
Respiratory Virus Detection Surveillance System (RVDSS) | Virologic surveillance (circulating type/subtype of influenza, and other respiratory viruses) | A network of 32 laboratories across the country, including provincial public health and hospital laboratories. They report on a weekly basis the number of specimens tested and the proportion positive for influenza (by subtype) and other respiratory viruses (e.g. para-influenza, adenovirus and respiratory syncytial virus). *Some of the 32 reporting RDVSS laboratories report for more than one laboratory. |
Monitor the trend of H1N1 laboratory detection as it rises and falls within each province/territory and Canada.Monitor other concomitant circulating viruses. |
National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) | Virologic surveillance (antigenic characterization and antiviral resistance) | Provide information on antigenic characterization and antiviral resistance based on samples received from public health and private laboratories. | Monitor changes in the antigenicity and antiviral sensitivity of the virus. |
Figure 1. Flow chart of FluWatch and Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 surveillance system
A.2.1.i Influenza Surveillance and Respiratory Virus Detection
a. FluWatch indicators
This includes information to create the national ILI activity level maps, number of regions reporting localized or widespread activity, and number of ILI outbreaks in Canada.
All provinces and territories (P/Ts) are asked to report on a weekly basis by Thursday 13:00 EDT their assessment of influenza activity level by surveillance regions within their jurisdiction, the number of regions reporting localized or widespread activity and the number of outbreaks in health facilities (long-term care facilities and hospitals) and schools. This information will cover all influenza, as P/Ts may not have the ability to stratify by the type/subtype of influenza that is circulating. As per the previously established reporting process all P/Ts are to collect this information on the FluWatch: Preliminary Feedback & Activity Level Reporting Form and email the form to Fluwatch@phac-aspc.gc.ca. P/Ts using the Canadian Network of Public Health Intelligence (CNPHI) platform may continue to do so. Please refer to Appendix A for a list of case definitions.
A.2.1.ii Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Surveillance
a. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 hospitalizations (case-based reporting)
New for the 2009-10 influenza season is that P/Ts are asked to report on a weekly basis by Monday 17:00 EDT a core set of data elements, as per the line list variables outlined in Appendix C.1, for all hospitalized cases and deaths (see below for additional information regarding reporting deaths) with Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 in their jurisdiction. The weekly line list should be emailed to HSFLUEPI@phac-aspc.gc.ca. Reporting of case-based Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 hospitalizations is to be kept in place as long as possible.
While not mandatory, completion of the Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza Case Report Form (Appendix C.3) by P/Ts is encouraged for Pandemic (H1N1) hospitalized cases. However, if completed, this information should also be included in the weekly line list.
b. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 deaths (case-based reporting)
Until further directives are provided, P/Ts are to continue to notify PHAC at HSFLUEPI@phac-aspc.gc.ca in real time of all new deaths.
Additionally, these cases should be updated in the weekly national Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 line list report that is forwarded to PHAC as described above. Reporting of case-by-case deaths with Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 hospitalizations is tobe kept in place as long as possible.
While not mandatory, completion of the Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza Case Report Form (Appendix C.3) is encouraged for Pandemic (H1N1) deaths. This information should also be included in the weekly line list.
c. Aggregate reporting of hospitalizations and deaths with laboratory-confirmed influenza
If, during the peak periods of the pandemic, P/Ts are no longer able to continue with individual case-based reporting, they may choose to shift from case-based reporting to weekly aggregate reporting. It is at the discretion of the P/Ts as to when they will need to switch from case-by-case reporting to aggregate reporting. If a P/T switches to aggregate reporting, it is recommended that the aggregate report be submitted by email on a weekly basis by Monday 17:00 EDT to HSFLUEPI@phac-aspc.gc.ca. See Appendix C.2: Weekly Aggregate Reporting of Hospitalizations and Deaths.
In this situation, PHAC requests that the P/Ts submit the following information on a weekly basis
Hospitalizations:
Deaths:
d. Severe respiratory illness
When the P/T is notified of any severe respiratory illness that meets the case definition (as per Appendix B), a detailed SRI case report form should be completed and emailed to HSFLUEPI@phac-aspc.gc.ca or faxed to 613-946-8808 as soon as possible. The case report form is provided in Appendix C.4.
e. Unusual respiratory events
A report of an unusual event should be made to PHAC as soon as the P/T becomes aware of it and has made an assessment. An email should be sent to HSFLUEPI@phac-aspc.gc.ca. Lines of communication with non-traditional surveillance partners (e.g. emergency departments, network of ICU physicians, tele-health leads, or media) is necessary to ensure that rapid identification and reporting of these events will occur (see case definition in Appendix A for examples of unusual events). Reporting of unusual activity is subjective: there may not be an established threshold by which to judge current activity, and so it may require a certain level of public health professional discretion.
f. Reporting of out-of province or territory cases10
If a hospitalization or death occurs in a P/T that is different from the patient’s P/T of residence, the P/T where the patient was hospitalized or died is responsible for reporting the information as soon as possible to the P/T where the case resides. The P/T where the case resides will be the jurisdiction responsible for reporting patient information to PHAC. If the P/T of residence is blank, PHAC will consider the reporting P/T to be the P/T of residence. For a P/T that has an agreement already in place that differs from the above recommendation, please continue as per the existing agreement.
g. Notifications of out-of country cases
If a hospitalization or death occurs in an individual who is not normally a resident of Canada, the P/T where the individual dies will be responsible for reporting this information to PHAC. PHAC will then report information on fatal cases through the international health reporting (IHR) channel, which subsequently forwards the information to the relevant country. Until further notification we request that P/Ts continue to forward this information to PHAC. It can be faxed to 613-946-8808 or emailed to HSFLUEPI@phac-aspc.gc.ca.
A.2.2.i Immunization Monitoring Program Active (IMPACT)
As per established agreements, IMPACT is to continue to submit a weekly aggregate count by hospital site on the number of paediatric patients admitted with influenza. Information about sex, age group and whether or not a child died is also to be reported.
IMPACT is to submit detailed case reports every two weeks on patients admitted to hospital with laboratory-confirmed Pandemic (H1N1) 2009. These reports provide detailed clinical information about the patient, such as the presence of underlying medical conditions, occurrence of secondary bacterial infections, and information on vaccination history and antiviral treatment. Please refer to Appendix E for more information on the IMPACT program.
A.2.2.ii Canadian Nosocomial Infections Surveillance Program (CNISP)
The 2009-10 influenza season will be the first time that CNISP will participate in routine influenza surveillance carried out by FluWatch. It is to provide information on the adult hospitalized population. Each week, CNISP submits by email a count of influenza-associated admissions (see protocol in Appendix D for list of conditions), all laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalizations and deaths. Once per month they are to submit detailed case reports of patients admitted with laboratory-confirmed influenza.
A.2.2.iii Difference Between Hospitalization Reports Provided by P/Ts and IMPACT and CNISP
The hospital and mortality information provided by the P/T partners differs from that reported through CNISP and IMPACT. While the data reported from P/Ts cover the whole population, the level of information provided is relatively limited (e.g. no clinical information, no vaccine or treatment information). It is used mainly to estimate population-based hospitalization and mortality rates, identify major groups at risk and provide information on the impact on the health care system.
The information provided by CNISP and IMPACT will be used to provide a more detailed clinical description of the population affected by pandemic influenza (clinical presentation, bacterial complications, level of care needed), allow us to evaluate the effectiveness of some interventions (vaccine and to a lesser degree antivirals) and to assess the impact that Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 is having on the health care system, since information on bed-counts will be received.
It should be noted that the IMPACT and CNISP databases will not be integrated into the national line-list database. Those databases will be analyzed separately, and the reports generated will clearly mention the source of the information. Therefore P/Ts are asked to submit both national line list and IMPACT/CNISP data; there will not be a risk of double counting.
A.2.2.iv FluWatch Sentinel Physician Network
Each week participating sentinel physicians and community health centres submit aggregate counts of patients with ILI by age group. Physicians submit their information by fax, or it is uploaded by some P/Ts into the Canadian Network of Public Health Intelligence (CNPHI). Data are usually received by Tuesday at 17:00 EDT.
A.2.2.v Respiratory Virus Detection Surveillance System (RVDSS)
The network of 32 public and private laboratories (some reporting laboratories may represent a group) submit to PHAC the number of respiratory specimens tested, the number and percent positive for influenza by subtype, and the number and percent positive for other respiratory viruses. Reports are received by Tuesday 17:00 EDT, and a national final report is posted on the PHAC FluWatch website on Wednesdays.
While PHAC-CIRID (Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases)
is leading the national Influenza surveillance, a number of other Centres within PHAC contribute to influenza surveillance.
A.2.3.i National Microbiology Laboratory (NML)
Each week the NML submits to PHAC FluWatch the number of specimens tested for strain characterization and antiviral sensitivity. This information is included in the FluWatch report.
A.2.3.ii Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control (CCDIC)
CCDIC is overseeing the CNISP surveillance network. When influenza surveillance through CNISP is fully operational, CCDIC will be reporting on a weekly basis for aggregate reporting and monthly for case-based reporting through HSFLUEPI@phac-aspc.gc.ca.
A.2.3.iii Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases (CIRID)
CIRID is responsible for collating, cleaning, analyzing and interpreting surveillance data coming from the different sources mentioned above (such as P/T partners, IMPACT, CNISP, RDVSS) and monitoring international official and informal sources of information.
Surveillance outputs are produced on a regular basis:
CIRID reports hospitalizations and deaths of non-Canadian residents to relevant countries through the IHR channel.
CIRID notifies the IHR focal point for Canada, WHO/PAHO, of unusual influenza events (cases with antiviral-resistant Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus, cluster of SRI, novel influenza strains, etc.) as per IHR requirements.
Other roles of PHAC-CIRID include chairing and organizing weekly (or bi-weekly) F/P/T conference calls to discuss technical and operational surveillance issues. CIRID also oversees the IMPACT and the FluWatch sentinel physician networks.
An attempt should be made to collect obesity information from all Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 hospitalized and fatal cases. When weight in kilograms and height in centimetres are available on patient charts both can be documented on the case report form or line list. PHAC will convert this information and calculate the body mass index (BMI). If only weight is available, please indicate this. When “obesity“is mentioned on the chart, please report it, irrespective of the severity of the obesity (whether obesity, morbid or severe obesity).
An attempt should be made to collect this information from all Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 hospitalized and fatal cases if the community or Regional Health Authority where the patient resides is considered isolated and/or remote by the specific P/T.
Remote Community:
A remote community is located ≥200 km or ≥4 hours away from a community with an acute care hospital but where year-round road access is available.Isolated Community:
An isolated community has no year-round road access. There may be air access, and ground access may be seasonal.
Laboratory-Confirmed Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 case
Person with (or without) clinical symptoms confirmed by one of the following tests:
Influenza-Like Illness
Acute onset of respiratory illness with fever and cough and with one or more of the following: sore throat, arthralgia, myalgia or prostration, which could be due to influenza virus.
N.B. In children under 5 years, gastrointestinal symptoms may also be present. In patients under 5 or older than 65 years, fever may not be prominent.
Hospitalizations with Pandemic (H1N1) 2009
Any person admitted to hospital with laboratory-confirmed Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza.12
Deaths with Pandemic (H1N1) 2009
A death occurring in any person with laboratory-confirmed Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza with no period of complete recovery between illness and death.
Influenza and Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza Outbreaks in Health Care Facilities and Residential Institutions (e.g. hospitals, long-term care facilities, correctional facilities, supportive living facilities)
Two or more cases of ILI within a seven-day period, including at least one laboratory-confirmed Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 case.
Influenza and Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza School Outbreak13
Greater than 10% absenteeism OR absenteeism that is higher than baseline levels, determined by schools or the surveillance region, that is likely due to ILI.
Other Community Outbreaks of Influenza and Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza (e.g. small communities or workplaces14 )
Two or more cases of ILI within a seven-day period, including at least one laboratory-confirmed Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 case.
Unusual Respiratory Event
Reporting of unusual events may require collaboration with non-official influenza surveillance partners or groups in your area. Some examples of unusual activity include the following:
The case definition for reporting SRI is applicable to any person meeting all of the following four criteria (I, II, III and IV):
SRI case (A)
A person admitted to hospitalwith the following:
I. Respiratory symptoms, i.e.
AND
II. Evidence of severe illness progression, i.e.
AND
AND
III. No alternative diagnosis within the first 72 hours of hospitalization, i.e.
AND
IV. One or more of the following exposures/conditions, i.e.
- Health care exposure involving primary care providers exposed to patients linked to an ongoing outbreak investigation or sick/dying animals;
OR
- Laboratory exposure in a person who works directly with emerging or re-emerging pathogens;
OR
- Animal exposure in a person employed as one of the following:
- domestic poultry/swine farm worker
- domestic poultry/swine processing plant worker
- domestic poultry/swine culler (catching, bagging, transporting
or disposing of dead birds/swine)- worker in live animal market
- dealer or trader of pet birds, pigs or other potentially affected
animals- chef working with live or recently killed domestic poultry, swine or
other potentially affected animalsOR
SRI death (B)
A deceased person with the following:
I. A history of respiratory symptoms, i.e.
AND
II. Autopsy performed with findings consistent with SRI, i.e.
AND
III. No alternative diagnosis that reasonably explains the illness AND
IV. One or more of the exposures/conditions listed above.
Core data elements to be completed for all hospitalized Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 cases and Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 deaths.
Variables |
Definition |
---|---|
Reporting date |
Date that data are reported to PHAC. |
P/T unique ID |
Provincial or territorial unique ID. |
P/T where case was identified |
Reporting province or territory. |
P/T where case resides |
Province or territory of residence where case resides. |
Age in years |
Case's age in years as of symptom onset date/specimen collection date/report date |
Age in months if <2 years |
If case is under 2 years of age, specify age in months |
Gender |
Specify gender as M=male, F=female or U=unknown |
Aboriginal |
If case is Aboriginal , specify as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown |
Aboriginal ethnicity |
Specify aboriginal ethnicity as 0=Unknown, 1=First Nations, 2=Inuit or 3=Metis |
Reserve status |
If case has First-Nations ethnicity, specify the reserve status as 1=Primarily On reserve, 2=Primarily Off reserve, 3=Unknown |
Registered Indian |
If case is First-Nations, specify if they are a registered Indian as Y=yes, N=no, U=unknown |
Isolated Community |
A case from an isolated community. An isolated community has no year round road access. There may be air access, and ground access may be seasonal. |
Remote Community |
A case from a remote community. A remote community is located ≥ 200 km or ≥ 4 hours away from a community with an acute care hospital but where year round access is available. |
Presence of underlying medical condition(s) |
Presence of any underlying conditions, specify as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown – Excluding pregnancy, obesity, current smoking |
Chronic pulmonary disease |
Case's underlying medical condition (chronic pulmonary disease including: COPD, bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, etc), specify as Y=yes, N=no or U=Unknown |
Asthma |
Case’s underlying medical condition (asthma that requires continuous or repeated use of inhaled or systemic corticosteroids or with previous exacerbation, which required hospital admission), specify as Y=yes, N=no, or U=unknown |
Chronic heart disease |
Case's underlying medical condition (chronic heart disease including congenital heart disease, hypertension with cardiac complications, chronic heart failure and ischemic heart disease), specify as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown |
Diabetes |
Case's underlying medical condition (diabetes type 2 requiring insulin or hypoglycaemic drugs or diabetes type 1), specify as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown |
Chronic liver disease |
Case's underlying medical condition (liver disease including cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis, biliary atresia), specify as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown |
Kidney disease |
Case's underlying medical condition (kidney disease including chronic renal failure, nephritic syndrome or renal transplantation), specify as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown |
Immunodeficiency |
Case's underlying medical condition (immunodeficiency related to use of immunosuppressive drugs (e.g. chemotherapy) or systemic steroids, AIDS/HIV infection, asplenia or immune dysfunction), specify as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown |
Anemia or hemoglobinopathy |
Case's underlying medical condition ( including Sickle cell anemia and chronic anemia), specify as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown |
Chronic neurological disease |
Case's underlying medical condition (stroke and neuromuscular disease that lead to impaired respiratory function or aspiration such as cerebral palsy or myasthenia gravis), specify as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown |
Other conditions |
Other underlying medical conditions, please specify._____________________________ |
Pregnancy or within first 6 weeks postpartum |
Case who is/was pregnant (Pregnancy), specify as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown |
Pregnancy trimester |
If case is pregnant, specify the trimester at time of illness as 0=post partum, 1=first trimester, 2=second trimester, 3=third trimester, U=unknown |
Patient weight (in kilograms or pounds) if available |
Patient weight indicated in kilograms or pounds |
Patient height (in centimetres or inches) if available |
Patient height indicated in centimetres or inches |
Obesity |
As noted in case’s chart, irrespective of severity, specify as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown |
Current smoking |
As noted in case’s chart, irrespective of type of smoker, specify as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown |
Symptom onset date |
Date of symptom onset (dd/mm/yyyy) |
Specimen collection date |
Date of specimen collection (dd/mm/yyyy) |
Hospitalization |
Was case hospitalized? Specify as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown |
Date of hospitalization |
Date on which the case was hospitalized (dd/mm/yyyy) |
Discharge |
Was case discharged from the hospital? Specify as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown |
ICU |
If case has been hospitalized, specify if case admitted to ICU (Intensive care unit) as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown |
Ventilation |
If case has been hospitalized, specify if case has been intubated as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown |
Death |
If the case has died, specify as Y=yes, N=no or U=unknown |
Date of death |
Date of death (dd/mm/yyyy) |
PDF Version
(1 Page, 35 KB)
PDF Version
(3 Pages, 90KB)
PDF Version
(5 Pages, 90KB)
The Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP) is a collaborative effort of the Canadian Hospital Epidemiology Committee (CHEC), a subcommittee of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada and the Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control (CCDIC) of PHAC. Data belong to CHEC-participating hospitals, which have a role in how the data are analyzed. The data are analyzed at CCDIC.
Since its establishment in 1994, CNISP's objectives have been the following:
There are 52 sentinel hospitals in the CNISP network from nine provinces across Canada. In the last three seasonal 'flu seasons (from 2005-2006 to 2008-2009), 15 CNISP hospitals have been involved in conducting laboratory-confirmed influenza surveillance in hospitalized patients >16 years of age. Eligible patients were those with episodes of influenza that were laboratory-confirmed by a positive rapid antigen test, positive PCR result or a positive culture for influenza A or B.
Changes to CNISP in Response to Pandemic (H1N1) 2009
In order to focus on community monitoring of adult in addition to paediatric disease, a comprehensive hospital-based surveillance system for patients admitted with influenza or acquiring influenza during hospitalization was formulated. All provincial and territorial authorities were supportive of having this done through CNISP. As a result, CNISP seasonal laboratory-confirmed influenza surveillance was extended to year-round reporting of both confirmed cases of 'flu and hospitalizations with a possible influenza-associated admitting diagnosis. The number of hospitals in the CNISP influenza network was expanded from 15 to 40 out of 52 CNISP hospitals. The surveillance period is June 1, 2009, to May 31, 2010. In practice, data collection began July 1, 2009. All CNSIP hospitals will be given the choice of doing surveillance for 1) laboratory-confirmed influenza, 2) influenza-associated admitting diagnosis or 3) both.
Strategically, these real-time hospital data are designed to fulfill two goals:
Data Collection
Weekly, participating hospitals submit the following data to PHAC:
Monthly, participating hospitals submit the following:
Quarterly, participating hospitals submit the following denominator data to PHAC:
Descriptive Data Analysis
Additionally, all the following denominators of each participating facility must be submitted:
Potential changes to CNISP in Response to Pandemic (H1N1) 2009
Primary analysis of CNISP data will be descriptive. In addition to the indicators mentioned above, CIRID has been asked to specify analyses of greatest interest. The Task Force may wish to consider the highest priorities, including most useful indicators and comparisons, the frequency with which they should be conducted, and with whom and in what formats they should be shared.
PDF Version
(3 Pages, 98KB)
PDF Version
(1 Page, 33KB)
PDF Version
(1 Page, 60KB)
Laboratory-confirmed
Any test the laboratory reports as confirmed positive for influenza A or B.
Note: if, in the best judgement of a CHEC member, a positive rapid antigen test or PCR test was a false positive, then the case should NOT be included.
Health care-associated
Must meet one of the following criteria:
Province |
City |
Hospital |
Participating |
Option* |
---|---|---|---|---|
British Columbia |
Vancouver |
Vancouver General Hospital |
Yes |
3 |
|
Vancouver |
Richmond General Hospital |
Yes |
3 |
|
Vancouver |
Lion’s Gate |
Yes |
3 |
|
Vancouver |
Powell River |
Yes |
3 |
|
Vancouver |
St. Mary’s Hospital |
Yes |
3 |
|
Vancouver |
Squamish Hospital |
|
3 |
|
Vancouver |
Victoria General |
|
3 |
|
Vancouver |
Royal Jubilee |
|
|
|
Vancouver |
Children’s and Women’s Health Center |
|
|
Alberta |
Calgary |
Peter Lougheed |
|
|
|
Calgary |
Rockyview General |
|
|
|
Calgary |
Foothills Hospital |
|
|
|
Calgary |
Alberta Children’s Hospital |
Yes |
Peds FRI† |
|
Calgary |
Rockyview Hospital |
|
|
|
Edmonton |
University of Alberta Hospital |
Yes |
3 |
|
Edmonton |
Stollery Children’s Hospital |
Yes |
Peds FRI† |
Saskatchewan |
Saskatoon |
Royal University Hospital |
Yes |
3 |
Manitoba |
Winnipeg |
Health Sciences Centre |
Yes |
3 |
|
Winnipeg |
University of Manitoba, Paediatric Infectious Diseases |
Yes |
Peds FRI† |
Ontario |
London |
St. Joseph’s Health care |
|
|
|
London |
Children’s Hospital of Western Ontario |
|
|
|
London |
Victoria Hospital |
|
|
|
London |
University Hospital |
|
|
|
Toronto |
Toronto Western Hospital |
Yes |
3 |
|
Toronto |
Toronto General Hospital |
|
|
|
Toronto |
Princess Margaret Hospital |
|
|
|
Toronto |
Mount Sinai Hospital |
Yes |
3 |
|
Toronto |
Sunnybrook Health science Centre |
Yes |
1 |
|
Toronto |
The Hospital for Sick Children |
yes |
Peds FRI† |
|
Kingston |
Kingston General Hospital |
|
|
|
Hamilton |
Hamilton Health Sciences Centre |
Yes |
3 |
|
Hamilton |
McMaster Site |
No |
|
|
Hamilton |
Chedoke |
No |
|
|
Hamilton |
Henderson & General Sites |
No |
|
|
Hamilton |
St. Joseph’s Healthcare |
Yes |
1 |
|
Ottawa |
The Ottawa Hospital |
Yes |
(Sept) |
|
Ottawa |
Civic Site |
Yes |
|
|
Ottawa |
General and Heart Institute |
Yes |
|
|
Ottawa |
Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario |
Yes |
Peds FRI† |
Quebec |
Montreal |
SMBD-Jewish General Hospital |
Yes |
3 |
|
Montreal |
Montreal Children’s Hospital |
Yes |
Peds FRI† |
|
Montreal |
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital |
|
|
|
Montreal |
Montreal General Hospital |
Yes |
3 |
|
Montreal |
Royal Victoria Hospital |
Yes |
3 |
|
Montreal |
Montreal Neurological Hospital |
Yes |
3 |
|
Montreal |
Montreal Chest Institute |
Yes |
3 |
|
Sherbrooke |
CHUS Hopital Fleurimont |
No |
|
|
Quebec City |
Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ |
no |
|
New Brunswick |
Moncton |
The Moncton Hospital |
Yes |
3 |
Nova Scotia |
Halifax |
QEII Health Sciences Centre |
Yes |
3 |
|
Halifax |
IWK Health Centre |
Yes |
Peds FRI† |
Newfoundland |
St John’s |
Health care Corp. of St. John’s General & Miller Sites |
|
|
|
St John’s |
Janeway Site |
|
|
|
St John’s |
St. Clare Site |
|
|
*Option 1 - Laboratory-based influenza surveillance
Option 2 - Admissions with influenza-related diagnosis
Option 3 - Both
† Paediatric febrile respiratory illness
The Immunization Monitoring Program Active, also known as IMPACT, is a paediatric hospital-based national active surveillance network for adverse events following immunization (AEFI), vaccine failures and selected infectious diseases (that are or are soon to be vaccine preventable). The core surveillance targets funded by PHAC include AEFI, pertussis, varicella, invasive pneumococcal disease, Haemophilus influenzae all types, acute flaccid paralysis and influenza. IMPACT is also involved in other surveillance activities financed by the private sector for targets such as invasive meningococcal disease and rotavirus.
IMPACT is administered by the Canadian Paediatric Society with funding from the Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infections Division of PHAC. IMPACT was started in December 1990 as a pilot project in five paediatric referral centres across Canada. It now involves 12 tertiary care level paediatric centres across the country, representing 90% of all tertiary care paediatric beds in Canada. The 12 IMPACT centres consist of the following:
Influenza became a surveillance target in 2004 when the Influenza Pilot Study was first instituted. At that time, the IMPACT surveillance objectives for influenza were as follows:
Each centre has a designated nurse monitor. The nurse monitor is responsible for identifying all influenza-related hospital admissions and deaths by review of daily admission lists, laboratory results and discharge lists, based on selected ICD-9/10 coding. Aggregate data and information from case report forms are sent to PHAC electronically, and the relevant information is re-distributed to provincial and territorial health authorities, Canadian health care practitioners and the general public.
On a weekly basis aggregate data are collected to report influenza activity in the paediatric population. These include the following:
Annually, an analysis is made from the information gathered in case report forms. Here are the main categories of the information collected:
Demographic |
|
General Health |
|
Immunization History |
|
Laboratory Diagnosis |
|
Treatment |
|
Clinical Manifestations |
|
Level of Care Required |
|
Outcome |
|
Travel History |
|
Changes to IMPACT in Response to Pandemic (H1N1) 2009
In response to the emerging pandemic in Canada, the weekly electronic aggregate data reporting has continued. However, as indicated above, since week 17 (April 26-May 2, 2009) the number and proportion of laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated paediatric hospitalizations and deaths attributable to Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus have been posted on FluWatch on a weekly basis. In terms of case reporting, the IMPACT-specific case report form is completed.
As for case report form analyses, because of the scope and seriousness of this pandemic it has been recommended that as of July 23, 2009, an analysis be performed twice a month to better follow the trend of serious cases and pinpoint other identifying factors that could assist in the understanding and clinical management of patients infected with Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus. This analysis will be specified and conducted by CIRID.
With the discontinuation of detailed case reporting as part of the enhanced FluWatch system, detailed information on hospitalized influenza cases will now be available only through the IMPACT and CNISP sentinel networks. Therefore, the objectives and deliverables associated with IMPACT data have been modified, and contract negotiations are currently under way. Data will be available for preliminary analysis in a more real-time way than in the past. Changes to the Case Report Form may need to be implemented to assist in the clinical description of hospitalized cases, including potential addition of the following (or other) fields:
Special surveillance studies will need to be specified on the basis of nationally determined priority questions.
Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Flu Virus Case Report Form
Only Confirmed Cases to be Reported to Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)
Please fax completed form to Public Health Agency of Canada (613) 946-880
PDF Version
(2 Pages, 47KB)
1 Refer to the Public Health Measures, Annex M of the Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan.
2 RIORP is an agreement between federal/provincial/territorial governments to guide the operating procedures to assist in coordinating the investigation and control of severe respiratory outbreaks in Canada.
3At the federal level, regular environmental scanning for the detection of potentially significant influenza-like illness is conducted using official information sources for influenza surveillance (e.g. WHO and international government influenza surveillance programs) as well as unconfirmed reports from early warning systems (e.g. ProMed and other media scanning software such as the Global Public Health Intelligence Network). Provinces and territories receive regular summaries of the international situation through the Canadian Integrated Outbreak Surveillance Centre (CIOSC).
4 During the interpandemic phases, these data(FluWatch) will be reported on a weekly (during the influenza season) and bi-weekly (during the summer months) basis
5 The Immunization Monitoring Program ACTive (IMPACT) is a paediatric hospital-based national active surveillance network for adverse events following immunization, vaccine failures and selected infectious diseases in children that are, or are soon to be, vaccine preventable.
6 Refer to the Public Health Measures, Annex M, of the Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan.
7 The level of enhanced surveillance will depend on the location of the first case(s) in Canada as well as the risk assessment and whether the cases arise in Canada or are imported cases and novel viruses arising in Canada.
8 Although it is considered unlikely that a pandemic strain will first emerge in Canada, the public health system needs to be prepared to deal with this possibility. Public Health Alerts need to address the situation for both imported and domestic cases.
9 Refer to the Public Health Measures, Annex M, of the Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan.
10 Please note that the recommendation differs slightly from that for other notifiable diseases, for which the "Protocol for Interprovincial/territorial Notification of Disease” states: The jurisdiction where the disease is diagnosed normally notifies the federal level or has the responsibility to make sure that the disease is notified by some jurisdiction.
11 At this time serology is not recommended as a front line testing procedure because of concerns pertaining to sensitivity and specificity as well as the intensity of labour associated with hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assays.
12 Provinces/territories may decide whether this case definition of hospitalization applies to someone who is admitted for a short period for observation. In this instance a “short period” is defined as <24 hours. Patients admitted to hospital for other reasons in whom Pandemic (H1N1) is an incidental finding (e.g. some obstetric or psychiatric patients) are still considered hospitalized cases with Pandemic (H1N1) 2009.
13 Newfoundland/Labrador regularly reports workplace outbreaks according to the definition used for school outbreaks in a separate reporting field on the CNPHI report form. All other provinces and territories sporadically report workplace outbreaks using the definition of “other” community outbreaks.
14 Newfoundland/Labrador regularly reports workplace outbreaks according to the definition used for school outbreaks. All other provinces and territories may sporadically report workplace outbreaks using the definition of “other” community outbreaks.
15 As per the influenza-like illness (ILI) definition, fever may not be prominent in patients under 5 years or 65 years and older as well as in immunosuppressed individuals. Failure to take temperature should not rule out a history of self-reported fever.
16 Severe ILI: In addition to the symptoms of ILI, severe ILI may include complications such as encephalitis, myocarditis or other severe and life-threatening complications